From 80a491fd40770db143d250772778ff4f89b807ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 07:06:56 -0400 Subject: nfs: convert nfs_rename to use async_rename infrastructure There isn't much sense in maintaining two separate versions of rename code. Convert nfs_rename to use the asynchronous rename infrastructure that nfs_sillyrename uses, and emulate synchronous behavior by having the task just wait on the reply. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Tested-by: Anna Schumaker Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/dir.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c index c8e48c2..b31f5d2 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c @@ -1940,6 +1940,7 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *old_inode = old_dentry->d_inode; struct inode *new_inode = new_dentry->d_inode; struct dentry *dentry = NULL, *rehash = NULL; + struct rpc_task *task; int error = -EBUSY; dfprintk(VFS, "NFS: rename(%pd2 -> %pd2, ct=%d)\n", @@ -1987,8 +1988,16 @@ int nfs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, if (new_inode != NULL) NFS_PROTO(new_inode)->return_delegation(new_inode); - error = NFS_PROTO(old_dir)->rename(old_dir, &old_dentry->d_name, - new_dir, &new_dentry->d_name); + task = nfs_async_rename(old_dir, new_dir, old_dentry, new_dentry, NULL); + if (IS_ERR(task)) { + error = PTR_ERR(task); + goto out; + } + + error = rpc_wait_for_completion_task(task); + if (error == 0) + error = task->tk_status; + rpc_put_task(task); nfs_mark_for_revalidate(old_inode); out: if (rehash) -- cgit v1.1