From 7477fd2e6b676fcd15861c2a96a7172f71afe0a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:42:27 -0700 Subject: [SOCK]: Add some notes about per-bind-bucket sock lookup. I was asked about "why don't we perform a sk_net filtering in bind_conflict calls, like we do in other sock lookup places" for a couple of times. Can we please add a comment about why we do not need one? Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c | 7 +++++++ net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c index 8d70cfb..828ea21 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c @@ -55,6 +55,13 @@ int inet_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk, struct hlist_node *node; int reuse = sk->sk_reuse; + /* + * Unlike other sk lookup places we do not check + * for sk_net here, since _all_ the socks listed + * in tb->owners list belong to the same net - the + * one this bucket belongs to. + */ + sk_for_each_bound(sk2, node, &tb->owners) { if (sk != sk2 && !inet_v6_ipv6only(sk2) && diff --git a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c index 78de42a..87801cc 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c +++ b/net/ipv6/inet6_connection_sock.c @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ int inet6_csk_bind_conflict(const struct sock *sk, const struct hlist_node *node; /* We must walk the whole port owner list in this case. -DaveM */ + /* + * See comment in inet_csk_bind_conflict about sock lookup + * vs net namespaces issues. + */ sk_for_each_bound(sk2, node, &tb->owners) { if (sk != sk2 && (!sk->sk_bound_dev_if || -- cgit v1.1