| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a guest wants to map a device-ID/event-ID combination that is
already mapped, we may end up in a situation where an LPI is never
"put", thus never being freed.
Since the GICv3 spec says that mapping an already mapped LPI is
UNPREDICTABLE, lets just bail out early in this situation to avoid
any potential leaks.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When userspace provides the doorbell address for an MSI to be
injected into the guest, we find a KVM device which feels responsible.
Lets check that this device is really an emulated ITS before we make
real use of the container_of-ed pointer.
[ Moved NULL-pointer check to caller of static function
- Christoffer ]
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we register an ITS device upon userland issuing the CTLR_INIT
ioctl to mark initialization of the ITS as done.
This deviates from the initialization sequence of the existing GIC
devices and does not play well with the way QEMU handles things.
To be more in line with what we are used to, register the ITS(es) just
before the first VCPU is about to run, so in the map_resources() call.
This involves iterating through the list of KVM devices and map each
ITS that we find.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During low memory conditions, we could be dereferencing a NULL pointer
when vgic_add_lpi fails to allocate memory.
Consider for example this call sequence:
vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi
itte->irq = vgic_add_lpi(kvm, lpi_nr);
update_lpi_config(kvm, itte->irq, NULL);
ret = kvm_read_guest(kvm, propbase + irq->intid
^^^^
kaboom?
Instead, return an error pointer from vgic_add_lpi and check the return
value from its single caller.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to the KVM API documentation a successful MSI injection
should return a value > 0 on success.
Return possible errors in vgic_its_trigger_msi() and report a
successful injection back to userland, while also reporting the
case where the MSI could not be delivered due to the guest not
having the LPI mapped, for instance.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we care to move all the checks that do not involve any memory
allocation, we can simplify the MAPI error handling. Let's do that,
it cannot hurt.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi has an extra "subcmd" argument, which is
already contained in the command buffer that all command handlers
obtain from the command queue. Let's drop it, as it is not that
useful.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no need to have separate functions to validate devices
and collections, as the architecture doesn't really distinguish the
two, and they are supposed to be managed the same way.
Let's turn the DevID checker into a generic one.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Going from the ITS structure to the corresponding KVM structure
would be quite handy at times. The kvm_device pointer that is
passed at create time is quite convenient for this, so let's
keep a copy of it in the vgic_its structure.
This will be put to a good use in subsequent patches.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of spreading random allocations all over the place,
consolidate allocation/init/freeing of collections in a pair
of constructor/destructor.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When checking that the storage address of a device entry is valid,
it is critical to compute the actual address of the entry, rather
than relying on the beginning of the page to match a CPU page of
the same size: for example, if the guest places the table at the
last 64kB boundary of RAM, but RAM size isn't a multiple of 64kB...
Fix this by computing the actual offset of the device ID in the
L2 page, and check the corresponding GFN.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Checking that the device_id fits if the table, and we must make
sure that the associated memory is also accessible.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The nr_entries variable in vgic_its_check_device_id actually
describe the size of the L1 table, and not the number of
entries in this table.
Rename it to l1_tbl_size, so that we can now change the code
with a better understanding of what is what.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ITS tables are stored in LE format. If the host is reading
a L1 table entry to check its validity, it must convert it to
the CPU endianness.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code will fail on valid indirect tables, and happily
use the ones that are pointing out of the guest RAM. Funny what a
small "!" can do for you...
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of sprinkling raw kref_get() calls everytime we cannot
do a normal vgic_get_irq(), use the existing vgic_get_irq_kref(),
which does the same thing and is paired with a vgic_put_irq().
vgic_get_irq_kref is moved to vgic.h in order to be easily shared.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When userland wants to inject an MSI into the guest, it uses the
KVM_SIGNAL_MSI ioctl, which carries the doorbell address along with
the payload and the device ID.
With the help of the KVM IO bus framework we learn the corresponding
ITS from the doorbell address. We then use our wrapper functions to
iterate the linked lists and find the proper Interrupt Translation Table
Entry (ITTE) and thus the corresponding struct vgic_irq to finally set
the pending bit.
We also provide the handler for the ITS "INT" command, which allows a
guest to trigger an MSI via the ITS command queue. Since this one knows
about the right ITS already, we directly call the MMIO handler function
without using the kvm_io_bus framework.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The connection between a device, an event ID, the LPI number and the
associated CPU is stored in in-memory tables in a GICv3, but their
format is not specified by the spec. Instead software uses a command
queue in a ring buffer to let an ITS implementation use its own
format.
Implement handlers for the various ITS commands and let them store
the requested relation into our own data structures. Those data
structures are protected by the its_lock mutex.
Our internal ring buffer read and write pointers are protected by the
its_cmd mutex, so that only one VCPU per ITS can handle commands at
any given time.
Error handling is very basic at the moment, as we don't have a good
way of communicating errors to the guest (usually an SError).
The INT command handler is missing from this patch, as we gain the
capability of actually injecting MSIs into the guest only later on.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The (system-wide) LPI configuration table is held in a table in
(guest) memory. To achieve reasonable performance, we cache this data
in our struct vgic_irq. If the guest updates the configuration data
(which consists of the enable bit and the priority value), it issues
an INV or INVALL command to allow us to update our information.
Provide functions that update that information for one LPI or all LPIs
mapped to a specific collection.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The LPI pending status for a GICv3 redistributor is held in a table
in (guest) memory. To achieve reasonable performance, we cache the
pending bit in our struct vgic_irq. The initial pending state must be
read from guest memory upon enabling LPIs for this redistributor.
As we can't access the guest memory while we hold the lpi_list spinlock,
we create a snapshot of the LPI list and iterate over that.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
LPIs are dynamically created (mapped) at guest runtime and their
actual number can be quite high, but is mostly assigned using a very
sparse allocation scheme. So arrays are not an ideal data structure
to hold the information.
We use a spin-lock protected linked list to hold all mapped LPIs,
represented by their struct vgic_irq. This lock is grouped between the
ap_list_lock and the vgic_irq lock in our locking order.
Also we store a pointer to that struct vgic_irq in our struct its_itte,
so we can easily access it.
Eventually we call our new vgic_get_lpi() from vgic_get_irq(), so
the VGIC code gets transparently access to LPIs.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add emulation for some basic MMIO registers used in the ITS emulation.
This includes:
- GITS_{CTLR,TYPER,IIDR}
- ID registers
- GITS_{CBASER,CREADR,CWRITER}
(which implement the ITS command buffer handling)
- GITS_BASER<n>
Most of the handlers are pretty straight forward, only the CWRITER
handler is a bit more involved by taking the new its_cmd mutex and
then iterating over the command buffer.
The registers holding base addresses and attributes are sanitised before
storing them.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Introduce a new KVM device that represents an ARM Interrupt Translation
Service (ITS) controller. Since there can be multiple of this per guest,
we can't piggy back on the existing GICv3 distributor device, but create
a new type of KVM device.
On the KVM_CREATE_DEVICE ioctl we allocate and initialize the ITS data
structure and store the pointer in the kvm_device data.
Upon an explicit init ioctl from userland (after having setup the MMIO
address) we register the handlers with the kvm_io_bus framework.
Any reference to an ITS thus has to go via this interface.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
|
The ARM GICv3 ITS emulation code goes into a separate file, but needs
to be connected to the GICv3 emulation, of which it is an option.
The ITS MMIO handlers require the respective ITS pointer to be passed in,
so we amend the existing VGIC MMIO framework to let it cope with that.
Also we introduce the basic ITS data structure and initialize it, but
don't return any success yet, as we are not yet ready for the show.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
