| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
into next
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove acpi notification handler when zone is removed.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Address memory leak for buffer allocated with ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Address memory leak for buffer allocated with ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The Int340x thermal provides a processor thermal device, which
is used to control processor thermal states. These devices are
either reported as a PCI device or an ACPI device. This
device provides power limits, control states and optional
temperature.
This change implements minimal requirements to expose processor
power limits which can be used during thermal power limiting.
Power limits are exposed via an attribute group called
"power_limits" under the device. The exported attributes
are:
power_limit_0_max_uw
power_limit_1_max_uw
power_limit_0_min_uw
power_limit_1_min_uw
power_limit_0_tmin_us
power_limit_1_tmin_us
power_limit_0_tmax_us
power_limit_1_tmax_us
power_limit_0_step_uw
power_limit_1_step_uw
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the
driver core.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
missing
If either of the entries was missing, the driver tried to free memory
using uninitialized pointer. In addition, it was dereferencing null
pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka.koskinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the
driver core.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal into thermal-soc
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
There was a left over return here so the error handling isn't run.
It leads to a small memory leak and a static checker warning.
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:351 __cpufreq_cooling_register()
info: ignoring unreachable code.
Fixes: f6859014c7e7 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Store frequencies in descending order")
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case
where registering cpu cooling at ti-soc-thermal thermal driver.
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case
where registering cpu cooling at db8500 thermal driver.
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
During imx_thermal probe we have the following log:
[ 1.514819] imx_thermal 2000000.aips-bus:tempmon: failed to register cpufreq cooling device: -517
[ 1.515064] platform 2000000.aips-bus:tempmon: Driver imx_thermal requests probe deferral
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
As samsung thermal support is enabled only for ARCH_EXYNOS, there is no
need to select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP from the arch-specific code. Removing this
dependency will also allow the driver to be enabled on 64-bit SoCs.
Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The return code from ->get_max_state() callback was not checked during
binding cooling device to thermal zone device.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Adding my copyright information for two purposes:
- To get cc'd for future patches to review (Only if people read this header
while sending mail)
- Have done enough changes to earn a place here?
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
get_property() was an over complicated beast with BUGs. It used to believe that
cpufreq table is present in ascending or descending order, which might not
always be true.
Previous patch has created another freq table in descending order for us and we
better use it now. With that get_property() simply goes away and another helper
get_level() comes in.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
CPUFreq framework *doesn't* guarantee that frequencies present in cpufreq table
will be in ascending or descending order. But cpu_cooling somehow assumes that.
Probably because most of current users are creating this list from DT, which is
done with the help of OPP layer. And OPP layer creates the list in ascending
order of frequencies.
But cpu_cooling can be used for other platforms too, which don't have
frequencies arranged in any order.
This patch tries to fix this issue by creating another list of valid frequencies
in descending order. Care is also taken to throw warnings for duplicate entries.
Later patches would use it to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We already know the value of 'cpufreq_dev->max_level' and so there is no need
calculating that once again. For this, we need to send 'cpufreq_dev' to
get_property().
Make all necessary changes for this change. Because cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
doesn't have access to 'cpufreq_dev', it is updated to iterate over the list of
cpufreq_cooling_devices to get cooling device for the cpu number passed to it.
This also makes it robust to return levels only for the CPU registered via a
cooling device. We don't have to support anything that isn't registered yet.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of
a local counter.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot
now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
CPU frequency tables don't update after the driver is registered and so we don't
need to iterate over them to find total number of states every time
cpufreq_get_max_state() is called. Do it once at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
get_cpu_frequency() isn't doing much by itself, just calling get_property(). And
so this wrapper isn't required at all. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_apply_cooling() has a single caller, cpufreq_set_cur_state() and
cpufreq_set_cur_state() is an unnecessary wrapper over cpufreq_apply_cooling().
Get rid of it by merging both routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from
cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to
be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise.
Lets update it once while the device registers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
__cpufreq_cooling_register()
This makes life easy and bug free. And is scalable for future resource
allocations.
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
policy
All CPUs present in 'allowed_cpus' share the same 'struct cpufreq_policy'
structure and so calling cpufreq_update_policy() for each of them doesn't make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cooling register
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs
passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency
constraints will be applied.
Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same
cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single
'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all
CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer.
So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc
comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as
policy->related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We aren't supposed to return our own error type here. Return what we got.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
ret is initialized before it is used, so no need to set it to 0 in its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
It will be overwritten soon with return value of kzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Its already zero, we allocated cpufreq_dev with kzalloc.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Just following coding guidelines here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
and frequency
This wasn't explained well anywhere and should be clearly specified. Lets add a
top level comment for this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cooling_cpufreq_lock isn't used to protect this structure and so the comment
over it is outdated. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
s/give/given
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@linaro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
In this patch, the cpu_cooling code checks for the usability of cpufreq
layer before proceeding with the CPU cooling device registration. The
main reason is: CPU cooling device is not usable if cpufreq cannot
switch frequencies.
Similar checks are spread in thermal drivers. Thus, the advantage now
is to have the check in a single place: cpu cooling device registration.
For this reason, this patch also updates the existing drivers that
depend on CPU cooling to simply propagate the error code of the cpu
cooling registration call. Therefore, in case cpufreq is not ready, the
thermal drivers will still return -EPROBE_DEFER, in an attempt to try
again when cpufreq layer gets ready.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Enable Intel Powerclamp driver on Xeon cpu id 0x56, package C-state
is available on this CPU for idle injection.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The node field of struct cpufreq_cooling_device was reintroduced in
2dcd851fe4b4 (thermal: cpu_cooling: Update always cpufreq policy with
thermal constraints) but without the documentation that it once had.
Add it back so that all the fields of struct cpufreq_cooling_device
are documented.
Cc: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull NOHZ update from Thomas Gleixner:
"Remove the call into the nohz idle code from the fake 'idle' thread in
the powerclamp driver along with the export of those functions which
was smuggeled in via the thermal tree. People have tried to hack
around it in the nohz core code, but it just violates all rightful
assumptions of that code about the only valid calling context (i.e.
the proper idle task).
The powerclamp trainwreck will still work, it just wont get the
benefit of long idle sleeps"
* 'timers-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
tick/powerclamp: Remove tick_nohz_idle abuse
|
| |/
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
commit 4dbd27711cd9 "tick: export nohz tick idle symbols for module
use" was merged via the thermal tree without an explicit ack from the
relevant maintainers.
The exports are abused by the intel powerclamp driver which implements
a fake idle state from a sched FIFO task. This causes all kinds of
wreckage in the NOHZ core code which rightfully assumes that
tick_nohz_idle_enter/exit() are only called from the idle task itself.
Recent changes in the NOHZ core lead to a failure of the powerclamp
driver and now people try to hack completely broken and backwards
workarounds into the NOHZ core code. This is completely unacceptable
and just papers over the real problem. There are way more subtle
issues lurking around the corner.
The real solution is to fix the powerclamp driver by rewriting it with
a sane concept, but that's beyond the scope of this.
So the only solution for now is to remove the calls into the core NOHZ
code from the powerclamp trainwreck along with the exports.
Fixes: d6d71ee4a14a "PM: Introduce Intel PowerClamp Driver"
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.11.1412181110110.17382@nanos
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux
Pull thermal management update from Zhang Rui:
"Summary:
- of-thermal extension to allow drivers to register and use its
functionality in a better way, without exploiting thermal core.
From Lukasz Majewski.
- Fix a bug in intel_soc_dts_thermal driver which calls a sleep
function in interrupt handler. From Maurice Petallo.
- add a thermal UAPI header file for exporting the thermal generic
netlink information to user-space. From Florian Fainelli.
- First round of refactoring in Exynos driver. Bartlomiej and Lukasz
are attempting to make it lean and easier to understand.
- New thermal driver for Rockchip (rk3288), with support for DT
thermal. From Caesar Wang.
- New thermal driver for Nvidia, Tegra124 SOCTHERM driver, with
support for DT thermal. From Mikko Perttunen.
- New cooling device, based on common clock framework. From Eduardo
Valentin.
- a couple of small fixes in thermal core framework. From Srinivas
Pandruvada, Javi Merino, Luis Henriques.
- Dropping Armada A375-Z1 SoC thermal support as the chip is not in
the market, armada folks decided to drop its support.
- a couple of small fixes and cleanups in int340x thermal driver"
* 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux: (58 commits)
thermal: provide an UAPI header file
Thermal/int340x: Clear the error value of the last acpi_bus_get_device() call
thermal/powerclamp: add id for braswell cpu
thermal: Intel SoC DTS: Don't do thermal zone update inside spin_lock
Thermal: fix platform_no_drv_owner.cocci warnings
Thermal/int340x: avoid unnecessary pointer casting
thermal: int3403: Delete a check before thermal_zone_device_unregister()
thermal/int3400: export uuids
thermal: of: Extend current of-thermal.c code to allow setting emulated temp
thermal: of: Extend of-thermal to export table of trip points
thermal: of: Rename struct __thermal_trip to struct thermal_trip
thermal: of: Extend of-thermal.c to provide check if trip point is valid
thermal: of: Extend of-thermal.c to provide number of trip points
thermal: Fix error path in thermal_init()
thermal: lock the thermal zone when switching governors
thermal: core: ignore invalid trip temperature
thermal: armada: Remove support for A375-Z1 SoC
thermal: rockchip: add driver for thermal
dt-bindings: document Rockchip thermal
thermal: exynos: remove exynos_tmu_data.h include
...
|
| | \ | |
| | \ | |
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Previously the return value of the last acpi_bus_get_device() was
returned. However, since we only report those issues, it should be
cleared to continue as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka.koskinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
drivers/thermal/int340x_thermal/int3403_thermal.c:468:3-8: No need to set .owner here. The core will do it.
Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Avoid pointer casting which may also lead to problems on big endian
64 bit systems.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|