| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Conflicts:
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx-sdb.dts
net/sched/cls_bpf.c
Two simple sets of overlapping changes.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux
Pull thermal fixes from Zhang Rui:
"Specifics:
- bogus type qualifier fix in OF thermal code.
- Minor fixes on imx and rcar thermal drivers.
- Update TI SoC thermal maintainer entry.
- Updated documentation of OF cpufreq cooling register"
* 'thermal-soc' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux:
thermal: rcar: Spelling/grammar: s/drier use .../driver uses ...s/
thermal: rcar: change type of ctemp in rcar_thermal_update_temp()
thermal: rcar: fix ENR register value
Documentation: thermal: document of_cpufreq_cooling_register()
Thermal: imx: add clk disable/enable for suspend/resume
MAINTAINERS: update ti-soc-thermal status
MAINTAINERS: Add linux-omap to list of reviewers for TI Thermal
thermal: of: Remove bogus type qualifier for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Since the ctemp is used for rcar_thermal_write() in
rcar_thermal_update_temp(), the type of 'ctemp' should be "u32" instead
of "int". This patch also changes type of the helper variables 'old'
and 'new'.
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
On R-Mobile APE6, since it has 3 thermal zones, ENR register
has enable bits in bit 19-16, bit 11-8 and bit 3-0.
However, on R-Car gen2, since it has 1 thermal zone, ENR register has
enable bits in bit 3-0. (In other words, the write value should always
be 0 for bit 31-4 of ENR register.)
So, this patch fixes the ENR register value using I/O resource sets.
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Thermal sensor's clk is from pll3_usb_otg, per hardware
design requirement, need to make sure pll3_usb_otg is disabled
before STOP mode is entered, otherwise, all PFDs under it may
enter incorrect state, this patch disables pll3_usb_otg before
suspend and enables it after resume.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <b20788@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
With gcc 4.1.2, 4.2, and 4.2.4 (4.4 and later are OK):
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Fixes: ce8be7785922de0e ("thermal: of: Extend of-thermal to export table of trip points")
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
|/ /
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Contrary to common expectations for an "int" return, these functions
return only a positive value -- if used correctly they cannot even
return 0 because the message header will necessarily be in the skb.
This makes the very common pattern of
if (genlmsg_end(...) < 0) { ... }
be a whole bunch of dead code. Many places also simply do
return nlmsg_end(...);
and the caller is expected to deal with it.
This also commonly (at least for me) causes errors, because it is very
common to write
if (my_function(...))
/* error condition */
and if my_function() does "return nlmsg_end()" this is of course wrong.
Additionally, there's not a single place in the kernel that actually
needs the message length returned, and if anyone needs it later then
it'll be very easy to just use skb->len there.
Remove this, and make the functions void. This removes a bunch of dead
code as described above. The patch adds lines because I did
- return nlmsg_end(...);
+ nlmsg_end(...);
+ return 0;
I could have preserved all the function's return values by returning
skb->len, but instead I've audited all the places calling the affected
functions and found that none cared. A few places actually compared
the return value with <= 0 in dump functionality, but that could just
be changed to < 0 with no change in behaviour, so I opted for the more
efficient version.
One instance of the error I've made numerous times now is also present
in net/phonet/pn_netlink.c in the route_dumpit() function - it didn't
check for <0 or <=0 and thus broke out of the loop every single time.
I've preserved this since it will (I think) have caused the messages to
userspace to be formatted differently with just a single message for
every SKB returned to userspace. It's possible that this isn't needed
for the tools that actually use this, but I don't even know what they
are so couldn't test that changing this behaviour would be acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
there is no ACPI device object
processor_thermal_device driver needs ACPI support to work. Thus, the driver
probing should fail when there is no ACPI device object asscociated.
This fixes a NULL pointer dereference when the driver is loaded
with INT340X feature disabled in BIOS.
Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
|
|/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For some INT340X thermal devices, even if they are not referred in
_TRT/_ART table, they still can be used by userspace for thermal control.
Thus change the code to enumerated all the INT340X devices,
no matter if they're referred in _TRT/_ART or not.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
|
|\ \
| | |
| | |
| | | |
into next
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Remove acpi notification handler when zone is removed.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Address memory leak for buffer allocated with ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Address memory leak for buffer allocated with ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
The Int340x thermal provides a processor thermal device, which
is used to control processor thermal states. These devices are
either reported as a PCI device or an ACPI device. This
device provides power limits, control states and optional
temperature.
This change implements minimal requirements to expose processor
power limits which can be used during thermal power limiting.
Power limits are exposed via an attribute group called
"power_limits" under the device. The exported attributes
are:
power_limit_0_max_uw
power_limit_1_max_uw
power_limit_0_min_uw
power_limit_1_min_uw
power_limit_0_tmin_us
power_limit_1_tmin_us
power_limit_0_tmax_us
power_limit_1_tmax_us
power_limit_0_step_uw
power_limit_1_step_uw
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the
driver core.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
missing
If either of the entries was missing, the driver tried to free memory
using uninitialized pointer. In addition, it was dereferencing null
pointer.
Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka.koskinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
This platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the
driver core.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal into thermal-soc
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
There was a left over return here so the error handling isn't run.
It leads to a small memory leak and a static checker warning.
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c:351 __cpufreq_cooling_register()
info: ignoring unreachable code.
Fixes: f6859014c7e7 ("thermal: cpu_cooling: Store frequencies in descending order")
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case
where registering cpu cooling at ti-soc-thermal thermal driver.
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case
where registering cpu cooling at db8500 thermal driver.
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
During imx_thermal probe we have the following log:
[ 1.514819] imx_thermal 2000000.aips-bus:tempmon: failed to register cpufreq cooling device: -517
[ 1.515064] platform 2000000.aips-bus:tempmon: Driver imx_thermal requests probe deferral
Avoid printing the error message in the EPROBE_DEFER case.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
As samsung thermal support is enabled only for ARCH_EXYNOS, there is no
need to select ARCH_HAS_BANDGAP from the arch-specific code. Removing this
dependency will also allow the driver to be enabled on 64-bit SoCs.
Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The return code from ->get_max_state() callback was not checked during
binding cooling device to thermal zone device.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Adding my copyright information for two purposes:
- To get cc'd for future patches to review (Only if people read this header
while sending mail)
- Have done enough changes to earn a place here?
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
get_property() was an over complicated beast with BUGs. It used to believe that
cpufreq table is present in ascending or descending order, which might not
always be true.
Previous patch has created another freq table in descending order for us and we
better use it now. With that get_property() simply goes away and another helper
get_level() comes in.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
CPUFreq framework *doesn't* guarantee that frequencies present in cpufreq table
will be in ascending or descending order. But cpu_cooling somehow assumes that.
Probably because most of current users are creating this list from DT, which is
done with the help of OPP layer. And OPP layer creates the list in ascending
order of frequencies.
But cpu_cooling can be used for other platforms too, which don't have
frequencies arranged in any order.
This patch tries to fix this issue by creating another list of valid frequencies
in descending order. Care is also taken to throw warnings for duplicate entries.
Later patches would use it to simplify code.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We already know the value of 'cpufreq_dev->max_level' and so there is no need
calculating that once again. For this, we need to send 'cpufreq_dev' to
get_property().
Make all necessary changes for this change. Because cpufreq_cooling_get_level()
doesn't have access to 'cpufreq_dev', it is updated to iterate over the list of
cpufreq_cooling_devices to get cooling device for the cpu number passed to it.
This also makes it robust to return levels only for the CPU registered via a
cooling device. We don't have to support anything that isn't registered yet.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of
a local counter.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot
now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
CPU frequency tables don't update after the driver is registered and so we don't
need to iterate over them to find total number of states every time
cpufreq_get_max_state() is called. Do it once at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
get_cpu_frequency() isn't doing much by itself, just calling get_property(). And
so this wrapper isn't required at all. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_apply_cooling() has a single caller, cpufreq_set_cur_state() and
cpufreq_set_cur_state() is an unnecessary wrapper over cpufreq_apply_cooling().
Get rid of it by merging both routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from
cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to
be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise.
Lets update it once while the device registers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
__cpufreq_cooling_register()
This makes life easy and bug free. And is scalable for future resource
allocations.
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
policy
All CPUs present in 'allowed_cpus' share the same 'struct cpufreq_policy'
structure and so calling cpufreq_update_policy() for each of them doesn't make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cooling register
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs
passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency
constraints will be applied.
Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same
cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single
'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all
CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer.
So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc
comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as
policy->related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We aren't supposed to return our own error type here. Return what we got.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
ret is initialized before it is used, so no need to set it to 0 in its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
It will be overwritten soon with return value of kzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Its already zero, we allocated cpufreq_dev with kzalloc.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Just following coding guidelines here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
and frequency
This wasn't explained well anywhere and should be clearly specified. Lets add a
top level comment for this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cooling_cpufreq_lock isn't used to protect this structure and so the comment
over it is outdated. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
s/give/given
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@linaro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
|