| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems like a historic accident that these return unsigned char *,
and in many places that means casts are required, more often than not.
Make these functions return void * and remove all the casts across
the tree, adding a (u8 *) cast only where the unsigned char pointer
was used directly, all done with the following spatch:
@@
expression SKB, LEN;
typedef u8;
identifier fn = {
skb_pull,
__skb_pull,
skb_pull_inline,
__pskb_pull_tail,
__pskb_pull,
pskb_pull
};
@@
- *(fn(SKB, LEN))
+ *(u8 *)fn(SKB, LEN)
@@
expression E, SKB, LEN;
identifier fn = {
skb_pull,
__skb_pull,
skb_pull_inline,
__pskb_pull_tail,
__pskb_pull,
pskb_pull
};
type T;
@@
- E = ((T *)(fn(SKB, LEN)))
+ E = fn(SKB, LEN)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A common pattern with skb_put() is to just want to memcpy()
some data into the new space, introduce skb_put_data() for
this.
An spatch similar to the one for skb_put_zero() converts many
of the places using it:
@@
identifier p, p2;
expression len, skb, data;
type t, t2;
@@
(
-p = skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
|
-p = (t)skb_put(skb, len);
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
)
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memcpy(p2, data, len);
|
-memcpy(p, data, len);
)
@@
type t, t2;
identifier p, p2;
expression skb, data;
@@
t *p;
...
(
-p = skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, sizeof(t));
|
-p = (t *)skb_put(skb, sizeof(t));
+p = skb_put_data(skb, data, sizeof(t));
)
(
p2 = (t2)p;
-memcpy(p2, data, sizeof(*p));
|
-memcpy(p, data, sizeof(*p));
)
@@
expression skb, len, data;
@@
-memcpy(skb_put(skb, len), data, len);
+skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
(again, manually post-processed to retain some comments)
Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Directly including access_ok.h can result in the following compile errors
if an architecture such as ia64 does not support direct unaligned accesses.
include/linux/unaligned/access_ok.h:7:19: error:
redefinition of 'get_unaligned_le16'
include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h:6:19: note:
previous definition of 'get_unaligned_le16' was here
include/linux/unaligned/access_ok.h:12:19: error:
redefinition of 'get_unaligned_le32'
include/linux/unaligned/le_struct.h:11:19: note:
previous definition of 'get_unaligned_le32' was here
Include asm/unaligned.h instead and let the architecture decide which
access functions to use.
Cc: Clément Perrochaud <clement.perrochaud@effinnov.com>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In that case, the firmware work will never be scheduled, will
never complete and thus the firmware will never be released.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It request_firmware returns 0, the request succeeded and the
firmware pointer is valid. No need to check for it.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
Add support for NXP NCI NFC controllers such as the NPC100 or PN7150
families.
Signed-off-by: Clément Perrochaud <clement.perrochaud@effinnov.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
|
