| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The i2c-designware-platform module has duplicate module information
when CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL is set. It gets the information
from both i2c-designware-platdrv and i2c-designware-baytrail. The
latter is optional extra code which ends up in the same module so it
should not export module information.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The read and write opcodes are global for all units on SoC and even across
Intel SoCs. Remove duplication of corresponding constants. At the same time
convert all current users.
No functional change.
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Boon Leong Ong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch marks baytrail_i2c_acquire() that it might sleep. Also it chages
while-loop to do-while and, though it is matter of taste, gives a chance to
check one more time before report a timeout.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems the idea behind the cross-check is to prevent acquire semaphore when
there is no release callback and vice versa. Thus, patch fixes a typo.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no need to export functions that are used as the callbacks in the
struct dw_i2c_dev. Otherwise we get the following warnings:
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c:63:5: warning: symbol 'baytrail_i2c_acquire' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-baytrail.c:114:6: warning: symbol 'baytrail_i2c_release' was not declared. Should it be static?
While here, do few indentation fixes, remove i2c_dw_eval_lock_support() from
functions exported to the modules and redundant assignment of local sem
variable.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It seems we have same message for different return values in get_sem() and
baytrail_i2c_acquire(). I suspect this is just a typo, so this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The patch converts hardcoded numerical constants to a named ones.
While here, align the variable name in get_sem() and reset_semaphore().
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|
|
This patch implements an I2C bus sharing mechanism between the host and platform
hardware on select Intel BayTrail SoC platforms using the X-Powers AXP288 PMIC.
On these platforms access to the PMIC must be shared with platform hardware. The
hardware unit assumes full control of the I2C bus and the host must request
access through a special semaphore. Hardware control of the bus also makes it
necessary to disable runtime pm to avoid interfering with hardware transactions.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
|