| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The upper bits of the vsync width, vsync offset and hsync width
were not parsed from the VBT. Parse these fields in this patch.
V2: Renamed lvds dvo timing structure members and code identation
fix (Jani's review comments)
V3: Corrected commit message, used "from the VBT"
Signed-off-by: Vincente Tsou <vincente.tsou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhav Chauhan <madhav.chauhan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1482430993-3265-1-git-send-email-madhav.chauhan@intel.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
specified in the VBT
My heuristic for detecting type 1 DVI DP++ adaptors based on the VBT
port information apparently didn't survive the reality of buggy VBTs.
In this particular case we have a machine with a natice HDMI port, but
the VBT tells us it's a DP++ port based on its capabilities.
The dvo_port information in VBT does claim that we're dealing with a
HDMI port though, but we have other machines which do the same even
when they actually have DP++ ports. So that piece of information alone
isn't sufficient to tell the two apart.
After staring at a bunch of VBTs from various machines, I have to
conclude that the only other semi-reliable clue we can use is the
presence of the AUX channel in the VBT. On this particular machine
AUX channel is specified as zero, whereas on some of the other machines
which listed the DP++ port as HDMI have a non-zero AUX channel.
I've also seen VBTs which have dvo_port a DP but have a zero AUX
channel. I believe those we need to treat as DP ports, so we'll limit
the AUX channel check to just the cases where dvo_port is HDMI.
If we encounter any more serious failures with this heuristic I think
we'll have to have to throw it out entirely. But that could mean that
there is a risk of type 1 DVI dongle users getting greeted by a
black screen, so I'd rather not go there unless absolutely necessary.
v2: Remove the duplicate PORT_A check (Daniel)
Fix some typos in the commit message
Cc: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@outlook.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Daniel Otero <daniel.otero@outlook.com>
Fixes: d61992565bd3 ("drm/i915: Determine DP++ type 1 DVI adaptor presence based on VBT")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97994
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478884464-14251-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The VBT has these mysterious H/V image sizes as part of the display
timings. Looking at some dumps those appear to be the physical
dimensions in mm. Which makes sense since the timing descriptor matches
the format used by EDID detailed timing descriptor, which defines these
as "H/V Addressable Video Image Size in mm".
So let's use that information from the panel fixed mode to get the
physical dimensions for LVDS/eDP/DSI displays. And with that we can
fill out the display_info so that userspace can get at it via
GetConnector.
v2: Use (hi<<8)|lo instead of broken (hi<<4)+lo
Handle LVDS and eDP too
Cc: Stephen Just <stephenjust@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Just <stephenjust@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96255
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1464685714-30507-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
DP dual mode type 1 DVI adaptors aren't required to implement any
registers, so it's a bit hard to detect them. The best way would
be to check the state of the CONFIG1 pin, but we have no way to
do that. So as a last resort, check the VBT to see if the HDMI
port is in fact a dual mode capable DP port.
v2: Deal with VBT code reorganization
Deal with DRM_DP_DUAL_MODE_UNKNOWN
Reduce DEVICE_TYPE_DP_DUAL_MODE_BITS a bit
Accept both DP and HDMI dvo_port in VBT as my BSW
at least declare its DP port as HDMI :(
v3: Ignore DEVICE_TYPE_NOT_HDMI_OUTPUT (Shashank)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Reported-by: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Fixes: 7a0baa623446 ("Revert "drm/i915: Disable 12bpc hdmi for now"")
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1462362322-31278-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These fields in VBT indicates the PWM source which
is used and also the controller number.
v2 by Jani: check for out of bounds access, some renames, change default
type, etc.
v3 by Jani: s/INTEL_BACKLIGHT_CABC/INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DSI_DCS/
Signed-off-by: Deepak M <m.deepak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/eee2f7b683a081f006a7df1ddad9b20fbf53c48c.1461676337.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds new fields that are not yet added in drm code
in child devices struct
Signed-off-by: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shubhangi Shrivastava <shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1459420907-11383-1-git-send-email-shubhangi.shrivastava@intel.com
|
|
We've been accumulating code across the driver that depends on the VBT
specific structures and defines. The VBT is an uncontrollable
beast. Encourage encapsulation of the VBT data by hiding the structures
and defines in a private header only to be included from intel_bios.c.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1458125015-7931-7-git-send-email-jani.nikula@intel.com
|