| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The bulk of the change is to convert the growing list of rings into an
array so that the relationship between the rings and the semaphore sync
registers can be easily computed.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, every batchbuffer can use all available fences (save
pinned and scanout, of course) without ever stalling the gpu!
In theory. Currently the actual pipelined update of the register is
disabled due to some stability issues. However, just the deferred update
is a significant win.
Based on a series of patches by Daniel Vetter.
The premise is that before every access to a buffer through the GTT we
have to declare whether we need a register or not. If the access is by
the GPU, a pipelined update to the register is made via the ringbuffer,
and we track the last seqno of the batches that access it. If by the
CPU we wait for the last GPU access and update the register (either
to clear or to set it for the current buffer).
One advantage of being able to pipeline changes is that we can defer the
actual updating of the fence register until we first need to access the
object through the GTT, i.e. we can eliminate the stall on set_tiling.
This is important as the userspace bo cache does not track the tiling
status of active buffers which generate frequent stalls on gen3 when
enabling tiling for an already bound buffer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This makes the various rings more consistent by removing the anomalous
handing of the rendering ring execbuffer dispatch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As the error occurred on the current object, it means that its state was
not changed and so it should be excluded from the unwind.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Besides the minimal improvement in reducing the execbuffer overhead, the
real benefit is clarifying a few routines.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
|
|
A number of dragons have been seen lurking within the execbuffer code.
The first step is then to isolate them from the rest and begin to
scrutinise them in depth. Suggested by Daniel Vetter.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
|
