| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Reduce the list iteration when incrementing the timeline by storing the
fences in increasing order.
v2: Prevent spinlock recursion on free during create
v3: Fixup rebase conflict inside comments that escaped the compiler.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170629211253.22766-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sync_pt were not adding themselves atomically to the timeline lists,
corruption imminent. Only a single list is required to track the
unsignaled sync_pt, so reduce it and rename the lock more appropriately
along with using idiomatic names to distinguish a list from links along
it.
v2: Prevent spinlock recursion on free during create (next patch) and
fixup crossref in kerneldoc
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170629210532.5617-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I plan to usurp the short name of struct fence for a core kernel struct,
and so I need to rename the specialised fence/timeline for DMA
operations to make room.
A consensus was reached in
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2016-July/113083.html
that making clear this fence applies to DMA operations was a good thing.
Since then the patch has grown a bit as usage increases, so hopefully it
remains a good thing!
(v2...: rebase, rerun spatch)
v3: Compile on msm, spotted a manual fixup that I broke.
v4: Try again for msm, sorry Daniel
coccinelle script:
@@
@@
- struct fence
+ struct dma_fence
@@
@@
- struct fence_ops
+ struct dma_fence_ops
@@
@@
- struct fence_cb
+ struct dma_fence_cb
@@
@@
- struct fence_array
+ struct dma_fence_array
@@
@@
- enum fence_flag_bits
+ enum dma_fence_flag_bits
@@
@@
(
- fence_init
+ dma_fence_init
|
- fence_release
+ dma_fence_release
|
- fence_free
+ dma_fence_free
|
- fence_get
+ dma_fence_get
|
- fence_get_rcu
+ dma_fence_get_rcu
|
- fence_put
+ dma_fence_put
|
- fence_signal
+ dma_fence_signal
|
- fence_signal_locked
+ dma_fence_signal_locked
|
- fence_default_wait
+ dma_fence_default_wait
|
- fence_add_callback
+ dma_fence_add_callback
|
- fence_remove_callback
+ dma_fence_remove_callback
|
- fence_enable_sw_signaling
+ dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling
|
- fence_is_signaled_locked
+ dma_fence_is_signaled_locked
|
- fence_is_signaled
+ dma_fence_is_signaled
|
- fence_is_later
+ dma_fence_is_later
|
- fence_later
+ dma_fence_later
|
- fence_wait_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_timeout
|
- fence_wait_any_timeout
+ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout
|
- fence_wait
+ dma_fence_wait
|
- fence_context_alloc
+ dma_fence_context_alloc
|
- fence_array_create
+ dma_fence_array_create
|
- to_fence_array
+ to_dma_fence_array
|
- fence_is_array
+ dma_fence_is_array
|
- trace_fence_emit
+ trace_dma_fence_emit
|
- FENCE_TRACE
+ DMA_FENCE_TRACE
|
- FENCE_WARN
+ DMA_FENCE_WARN
|
- FENCE_ERR
+ DMA_FENCE_ERR
)
(
...
)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161025120045.28839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
SW_SYNC allows to run tests on the sync_file framework via debugfs on
<debugfs>/sync/sw_sync
Opening and closing the file triggers creation and release of a sync
timeline. To create fences on this timeline the SW_SYNC_IOC_CREATE_FENCE
ioctl should be used. To increment the timeline value use SW_SYNC_IOC_INC.
Also it exports Sync information on
<debugfs>/sync/info
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|