summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* cpufreq: unicore32: replace IS_ERR and PTR_ERR with PTR_ERR_OR_ZERODuan Jiong2014-04-211-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | This patch fixes coccinelle error regarding usage of IS_ERR and PTR_ERR instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO. Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: unicore32: fix typo issue for 'clk'Chen Gang2014-04-071-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Need use 'clk' instead of 'mclk', which is the original removed local variable. The related original commit: "652ed95 cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routine" The related error with allmodconfig for unicore32: CC drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.o drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c: In function ‘ucv2_target’: drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c:48: error: ‘struct cpufreq_policy’ has no member named ‘mclk’ make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2 Fixes: 652ed95d5fa6 (cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routine) Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: Convert existing drivers to use cpufreq_freq_transition_{begin|end}Viresh Kumar2014-03-261-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). This patch converts existing drivers to use these new set of routines. Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routineViresh Kumar2014-01-171-12/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(), to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them. This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them. All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get() and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init(). Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: send new set of notification for transition failuresViresh Kumar2014-01-061-9/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In the current code, if we fail during a frequency transition, we simply send the POSTCHANGE notification with the old frequency. This isn't enough. One of the core users of these notifications is the code responsible for keeping loops_per_jiffy aligned with frequency changes. And mostly it is written as: if ((val == CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE && freq->old < freq->new) || (val == CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE && freq->old > freq->new)) { update-loops-per-jiffy... } So, suppose we are changing to a higher frequency and failed during transition, then following will happen: - CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE notification with freq-new > freq-old - CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE notification with freq-new == freq-old The first one will update loops_per_jiffy and second one will do nothing. Even if we send the 2nd notification by exchanging values of freq-new and old, some users of these notifications might get unstable. This can be fixed by simply calling cpufreq_notify_post_transition() with error code and this routine will take care of sending notifications in the correct order. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [rjw: Folded 3 patches into one, rebased unicore2 changes] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: unicore2: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar2013-10-161-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: add new routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits()Viresh Kumar2013-10-161-3/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Most of the users of cpufreq_verify_within_limits() calls it for limiting with min/max from policy->cpuinfo. We can make that code simple by introducing another routine which will do this for them automatically. This patch adds another routine cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits() and updates others to use it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: unicore2: Staticize local symbolJingoo Han2013-08-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | This local symbol is used only in this file. Fix the following sparse warnings: drivers/cpufreq/unicore2-cpufreq.c:27:5: warning: symbol 'ucv2_verify_speed' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* cpufreq: unicore2: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreqViresh Kumar2013-04-101-0/+92
This patch moves cpufreq driver of UNICORE-2 architecture to drivers/cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud