Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | x86: x86_32 has its own irq_regs definition | Harvey Harrison | 2008-11-10 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Impact: cleanup Arches that have their own irq_regs definition are expected to define ARCH_HAS_OWN_IRQ_REGS or else a generic (unused) set will also be defined in lib/irq_regs.c Sparse noticed the unused generic one had no prototype: lib/irq_regs.c:15:1: warning: symbol 'per_cpu____irq_regs' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | ||||
* | x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guards | H. Peter Anvin | 2008-10-22 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | | | | | | | | Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> | ||||
* | x86, um: ... and asm-x86 move | Al Viro | 2008-10-22 | 1 | -0/+29 |
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> |