diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig | 43 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig b/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig index 7684d83..ca00191 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig @@ -1,9 +1,39 @@ menu "DCCP CCIDs Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL)" depends on IP_DCCP && EXPERIMENTAL +config IP_DCCP_CCID2 + tristate "CCID2 (TCP-Like) (EXPERIMENTAL)" + depends on IP_DCCP + def_tristate IP_DCCP + select IP_DCCP_ACKVEC + ---help--- + CCID 2, TCP-like Congestion Control, denotes Additive Increase, + Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control with behavior + modelled directly on TCP, including congestion window, slow start, + timeouts, and so forth [RFC 2581]. CCID 2 achieves maximum + bandwidth over the long term, consistent with the use of end-to-end + congestion control, but halves its congestion window in response to + each congestion event. This leads to the abrupt rate changes + typical of TCP. Applications should use CCID 2 if they prefer + maximum bandwidth utilization to steadiness of rate. This is often + the case for applications that are not playing their data directly + to the user. For example, a hypothetical application that + transferred files over DCCP, using application-level retransmissions + for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may + also prefer CCID 2. + + CCID 2 is further described in: + http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid2-10.txt + + This text was extracted from: + http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt + + If in doubt, say M. + config IP_DCCP_CCID3 - tristate "CCID3 (TFRC) (EXPERIMENTAL)" + tristate "CCID3 (TCP-Friendly) (EXPERIMENTAL)" depends on IP_DCCP + def_tristate IP_DCCP ---help--- CCID 3 denotes TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC), an equation-based rate-controlled congestion control mechanism. TFRC is designed to @@ -15,10 +45,15 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID3 suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a relatively smooth sending rate is of importance. - CCID 3 is further described in [CCID 3 PROFILE]. The TFRC - congestion control algorithms were initially described in RFC 3448. + CCID 3 is further described in: + + http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-ccid3-11.txt. + + The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in + RFC 3448. - This text was extracted from draft-ietf-dccp-spec-11.txt. + This text was extracted from: + http://www.icir.org/kohler/dccp/draft-ietf-dccp-spec-13.txt If in doubt, say M. |
