diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Makefile | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/percpu-rwsem.c | 154 |
2 files changed, 155 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index e2152fa..e959c20 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ endif lib-y := ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \ rbtree.o radix-tree.o dump_stack.o timerqueue.o\ - idr.o int_sqrt.o extable.o \ + idr.o int_sqrt.o extable.o percpu-rwsem.o \ sha1.o md5.o irq_regs.o reciprocal_div.o argv_split.o \ proportions.o flex_proportions.o prio_heap.o ratelimit.o show_mem.o \ is_single_threaded.o plist.o decompress.o kobject_uevent.o \ diff --git a/lib/percpu-rwsem.c b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e03bcf --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -0,0 +1,154 @@ +#include <linux/mutex.h> +#include <linux/rwsem.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> +#include <linux/wait.h> +#include <linux/percpu-rwsem.h> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> + +int percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + brw->fast_read_ctr = alloc_percpu(int); + if (unlikely(!brw->fast_read_ctr)) + return -ENOMEM; + + mutex_init(&brw->writer_mutex); + init_rwsem(&brw->rw_sem); + atomic_set(&brw->slow_read_ctr, 0); + init_waitqueue_head(&brw->write_waitq); + return 0; +} + +void percpu_free_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + free_percpu(brw->fast_read_ctr); + brw->fast_read_ctr = NULL; /* catch use after free bugs */ +} + +/* + * This is the fast-path for down_read/up_read, it only needs to ensure + * there is no pending writer (!mutex_is_locked() check) and inc/dec the + * fast per-cpu counter. The writer uses synchronize_sched_expedited() to + * serialize with the preempt-disabled section below. + * + * The nontrivial part is that we should guarantee acquire/release semantics + * in case when + * + * R_W: down_write() comes after up_read(), the writer should see all + * changes done by the reader + * or + * W_R: down_read() comes after up_write(), the reader should see all + * changes done by the writer + * + * If this helper fails the callers rely on the normal rw_semaphore and + * atomic_dec_and_test(), so in this case we have the necessary barriers. + * + * But if it succeeds we do not have any barriers, mutex_is_locked() or + * __this_cpu_add() below can be reordered with any LOAD/STORE done by the + * reader inside the critical section. See the comments in down_write and + * up_write below. + */ +static bool update_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw, unsigned int val) +{ + bool success = false; + + preempt_disable(); + if (likely(!mutex_is_locked(&brw->writer_mutex))) { + __this_cpu_add(*brw->fast_read_ctr, val); + success = true; + } + preempt_enable(); + + return success; +} + +/* + * Like the normal down_read() this is not recursive, the writer can + * come after the first percpu_down_read() and create the deadlock. + */ +void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, +1))) + return; + + down_read(&brw->rw_sem); + atomic_inc(&brw->slow_read_ctr); + up_read(&brw->rw_sem); +} + +void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + if (likely(update_fast_ctr(brw, -1))) + return; + + /* false-positive is possible but harmless */ + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&brw->slow_read_ctr)) + wake_up_all(&brw->write_waitq); +} + +static int clear_fast_ctr(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + unsigned int sum = 0; + int cpu; + + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + sum += per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu); + per_cpu(*brw->fast_read_ctr, cpu) = 0; + } + + return sum; +} + +/* + * A writer takes ->writer_mutex to exclude other writers and to force the + * readers to switch to the slow mode, note the mutex_is_locked() check in + * update_fast_ctr(). + * + * After that the readers can only inc/dec the slow ->slow_read_ctr counter, + * ->fast_read_ctr is stable. Once the writer moves its sum into the slow + * counter it represents the number of active readers. + * + * Finally the writer takes ->rw_sem for writing and blocks the new readers, + * then waits until the slow counter becomes zero. + */ +void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + /* also blocks update_fast_ctr() which checks mutex_is_locked() */ + mutex_lock(&brw->writer_mutex); + + /* + * 1. Ensures mutex_is_locked() is visible to any down_read/up_read + * so that update_fast_ctr() can't succeed. + * + * 2. Ensures we see the result of every previous this_cpu_add() in + * update_fast_ctr(). + * + * 3. Ensures that if any reader has exited its critical section via + * fast-path, it executes a full memory barrier before we return. + * See R_W case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + */ + synchronize_sched_expedited(); + + /* nobody can use fast_read_ctr, move its sum into slow_read_ctr */ + atomic_add(clear_fast_ctr(brw), &brw->slow_read_ctr); + + /* block the new readers completely */ + down_write(&brw->rw_sem); + + /* wait for all readers to complete their percpu_up_read() */ + wait_event(brw->write_waitq, !atomic_read(&brw->slow_read_ctr)); +} + +void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *brw) +{ + /* allow the new readers, but only the slow-path */ + up_write(&brw->rw_sem); + + /* + * Insert the barrier before the next fast-path in down_read, + * see W_R case in the comment above update_fast_ctr(). + */ + synchronize_sched_expedited(); + mutex_unlock(&brw->writer_mutex); +} |
