diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt | 198 |
1 files changed, 198 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt b/Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b88ebe4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/nommu-mmap.txt @@ -0,0 +1,198 @@ + ============================= + NO-MMU MEMORY MAPPING SUPPORT + ============================= + +The kernel has limited support for memory mapping under no-MMU conditions, such +as are used in uClinux environments. From the userspace point of view, memory +mapping is made use of in conjunction with the mmap() system call, the shmat() +call and the execve() system call. From the kernel's point of view, execve() +mapping is actually performed by the binfmt drivers, which call back into the +mmap() routines to do the actual work. + +Memory mapping behaviour also involves the way fork(), vfork(), clone() and +ptrace() work. Under uClinux there is no fork(), and clone() must be supplied +the CLONE_VM flag. + +The behaviour is similar between the MMU and no-MMU cases, but not identical; +and it's also much more restricted in the latter case: + + (*) Anonymous mapping, MAP_PRIVATE + + In the MMU case: VM regions backed by arbitrary pages; copy-on-write + across fork. + + In the no-MMU case: VM regions backed by arbitrary contiguous runs of + pages. + + (*) Anonymous mapping, MAP_SHARED + + These behave very much like private mappings, except that they're + shared across fork() or clone() without CLONE_VM in the MMU case. Since + the no-MMU case doesn't support these, behaviour is identical to + MAP_PRIVATE there. + + (*) File, MAP_PRIVATE, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC, !PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: VM regions backed by pages read from file; changes to + the underlying file are reflected in the mapping; copied across fork. + + In the no-MMU case: + + - If one exists, the kernel will re-use an existing mapping to the + same segment of the same file if that has compatible permissions, + even if this was created by another process. + + - If possible, the file mapping will be directly on the backing device + if the backing device has the BDI_CAP_MAP_DIRECT capability and + appropriate mapping protection capabilities. Ramfs, romfs, cramfs + and mtd might all permit this. + + - If the backing device device can't or won't permit direct sharing, + but does have the BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY capability, then a copy of the + appropriate bit of the file will be read into a contiguous bit of + memory and any extraneous space beyond the EOF will be cleared + + - Writes to the file do not affect the mapping; writes to the mapping + are visible in other processes (no MMU protection), but should not + happen. + + (*) File, MAP_PRIVATE, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC, PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: like the non-PROT_WRITE case, except that the pages in + question get copied before the write actually happens. From that point + on writes to the file underneath that page no longer get reflected into + the mapping's backing pages. The page is then backed by swap instead. + + In the no-MMU case: works much like the non-PROT_WRITE case, except + that a copy is always taken and never shared. + + (*) Regular file / blockdev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: VM regions backed by pages read from file; changes to + pages written back to file; writes to file reflected into pages backing + mapping; shared across fork. + + In the no-MMU case: not supported. + + (*) Memory backed regular file, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. + + In the no-MMU case: The filesystem providing the memory-backed file + (such as ramfs or tmpfs) may choose to honour an open, truncate, mmap + sequence by providing a contiguous sequence of pages to map. In that + case, a shared-writable memory mapping will be possible. It will work + as for the MMU case. If the filesystem does not provide any such + support, then the mapping request will be denied. + + (*) Memory backed blockdev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. + + In the no-MMU case: As for memory backed regular files, but the + blockdev must be able to provide a contiguous run of pages without + truncate being called. The ramdisk driver could do this if it allocated + all its memory as a contiguous array upfront. + + (*) Memory backed chardev, MAP_SHARED, PROT_READ / PROT_EXEC / PROT_WRITE + + In the MMU case: As for ordinary regular files. + + In the no-MMU case: The character device driver may choose to honour + the mmap() by providing direct access to the underlying device if it + provides memory or quasi-memory that can be accessed directly. Examples + of such are frame buffers and flash devices. If the driver does not + provide any such support, then the mapping request will be denied. + + +============================ +FURTHER NOTES ON NO-MMU MMAP +============================ + + (*) A request for a private mapping of less than a page in size may not return + a page-aligned buffer. This is because the kernel calls kmalloc() to + allocate the buffer, not get_free_page(). + + (*) A list of all the mappings on the system is visible through /proc/maps in + no-MMU mode. + + (*) Supplying MAP_FIXED or a requesting a particular mapping address will + result in an error. + + (*) Files mapped privately usually have to have a read method provided by the + driver or filesystem so that the contents can be read into the memory + allocated if mmap() chooses not to map the backing device directly. An + error will result if they don't. This is most likely to be encountered + with character device files, pipes, fifos and sockets. + +============================================ +PROVIDING SHAREABLE CHARACTER DEVICE SUPPORT +============================================ + +To provide shareable character device support, a driver must provide a +file->f_op->get_unmapped_area() operation. The mmap() routines will call this +to get a proposed address for the mapping. This may return an error if it +doesn't wish to honour the mapping because it's too long, at a weird offset, +under some unsupported combination of flags or whatever. + +The driver should also provide backing device information with capabilities set +to indicate the permitted types of mapping on such devices. The default is +assumed to be readable and writable, not executable, and only shareable +directly (can't be copied). + +The file->f_op->mmap() operation will be called to actually inaugurate the +mapping. It can be rejected at that point. Returning the ENOSYS error will +cause the mapping to be copied instead if BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY is specified. + +The vm_ops->close() routine will be invoked when the last mapping on a chardev +is removed. An existing mapping will be shared, partially or not, if possible +without notifying the driver. + +It is permitted also for the file->f_op->get_unmapped_area() operation to +return -ENOSYS. This will be taken to mean that this operation just doesn't +want to handle it, despite the fact it's got an operation. For instance, it +might try directing the call to a secondary driver which turns out not to +implement it. Such is the case for the framebuffer driver which attempts to +direct the call to the device-specific driver. Under such circumstances, the +mapping request will be rejected if BDI_CAP_MAP_COPY is not specified, and a +copy mapped otherwise. + +IMPORTANT NOTE: + + Some types of device may present a different appearance to anyone + looking at them in certain modes. Flash chips can be like this; for + instance if they're in programming or erase mode, you might see the + status reflected in the mapping, instead of the data. + + In such a case, care must be taken lest userspace see a shared or a + private mapping showing such information when the driver is busy + controlling the device. Remember especially: private executable + mappings may still be mapped directly off the device under some + circumstances! + + +============================================== +PROVIDING SHAREABLE MEMORY-BACKED FILE SUPPORT +============================================== + +Provision of shared mappings on memory backed files is similar to the provision +of support for shared mapped character devices. The main difference is that the +filesystem providing the service will probably allocate a contiguous collection +of pages and permit mappings to be made on that. + +It is recommended that a truncate operation applied to such a file that +increases the file size, if that file is empty, be taken as a request to gather +enough pages to honour a mapping. This is required to support POSIX shared +memory. + +Memory backed devices are indicated by the mapping's backing device info having +the memory_backed flag set. + + +======================================== +PROVIDING SHAREABLE BLOCK DEVICE SUPPORT +======================================== + +Provision of shared mappings on block device files is exactly the same as for +character devices. If there isn't a real device underneath, then the driver +should allocate sufficient contiguous memory to honour any supported mapping. |
