diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c index 36a179f..c133712 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c @@ -1183,31 +1183,11 @@ xlog_verify_head( ASSERT(0); return 0; } - - /* - * Now verify the tail based on the updated head. This is - * required because the torn writes trimmed from the head could - * have been written over the tail of a previous record. Return - * any errors since recovery cannot proceed if the tail is - * corrupt. - * - * XXX: This leaves a gap in truly robust protection from torn - * writes in the log. If the head is behind the tail, the tail - * pushes forward to create some space and then a crash occurs - * causing the writes into the previous record's tail region to - * tear, log recovery isn't able to recover. - * - * How likely is this to occur? If possible, can we do something - * more intelligent here? Is it safe to push the tail forward if - * we can determine that the tail is within the range of the - * torn write (e.g., the kernel can only overwrite the tail if - * it has actually been pushed forward)? Alternatively, could we - * somehow prevent this condition at runtime? - */ - error = xlog_verify_tail(log, *head_blk, *tail_blk); } + if (error) + return error; - return error; + return xlog_verify_tail(log, *head_blk, *tail_blk); } /* |
