diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/rfkill.txt | 32 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/rfkill/rfkill.c | 16 |
2 files changed, 30 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/rfkill.txt b/Documentation/rfkill.txt index 6fcb306..b65f079 100644 --- a/Documentation/rfkill.txt +++ b/Documentation/rfkill.txt @@ -341,6 +341,8 @@ key that does nothing by itself, as well as any hot key that is type-specific 3.1 Guidelines for wireless device drivers ------------------------------------------ +(in this text, rfkill->foo means the foo field of struct rfkill). + 1. Each independent transmitter in a wireless device (usually there is only one transmitter per device) should have a SINGLE rfkill class attached to it. @@ -363,10 +365,32 @@ This rule exists because users of the rfkill subsystem expect to get (and set, when possible) the overall transmitter rfkill state, not of a particular rfkill line. -5. During suspend, the rfkill class will attempt to soft-block the radio -through a call to rfkill->toggle_radio, and will try to restore its previous -state during resume. After a rfkill class is suspended, it will *not* call -rfkill->toggle_radio until it is resumed. +5. The wireless device driver MUST NOT leave the transmitter enabled during +suspend and hibernation unless: + + 5.1. The transmitter has to be enabled for some sort of functionality + like wake-on-wireless-packet or autonomous packed forwarding in a mesh + network, and that functionality is enabled for this suspend/hibernation + cycle. + +AND + + 5.2. The device was not on a user-requested BLOCKED state before + the suspend (i.e. the driver must NOT unblock a device, not even + to support wake-on-wireless-packet or remain in the mesh). + +In other words, there is absolutely no allowed scenario where a driver can +automatically take action to unblock a rfkill controller (obviously, this deals +with scenarios where soft-blocking or both soft and hard blocking is happening. +Scenarios where hardware rfkill lines are the only ones blocking the +transmitter are outside of this rule, since the wireless device driver does not +control its input hardware rfkill lines in the first place). + +6. During resume, rfkill will try to restore its previous state. + +7. After a rfkill class is suspended, it will *not* call rfkill->toggle_radio +until it is resumed. + Example of a WLAN wireless driver connected to the rfkill subsystem: -------------------------------------------------------------------- diff --git a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c index d573579..ea0dc04 100644 --- a/net/rfkill/rfkill.c +++ b/net/rfkill/rfkill.c @@ -512,21 +512,9 @@ static void rfkill_release(struct device *dev) #ifdef CONFIG_PM static int rfkill_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state) { - struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev); - - if (dev->power.power_state.event != state.event) { - if (state.event & PM_EVENT_SLEEP) { - /* Stop transmitter, keep state, no notifies */ - update_rfkill_state(rfkill); - - mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex); - rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data, - RFKILL_STATE_SOFT_BLOCKED); - mutex_unlock(&rfkill->mutex); - } - + /* mark class device as suspended */ + if (dev->power.power_state.event != state.event) dev->power.power_state = state; - } return 0; } |
