diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 3150b21..6ba0c60 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -2398,6 +2398,7 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer) struct worker *rescuer = __rescuer; struct workqueue_struct *wq = rescuer->rescue_wq; struct list_head *scheduled = &rescuer->scheduled; + bool should_stop; set_user_nice(current, RESCUER_NICE_LEVEL); @@ -2409,11 +2410,15 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer) repeat: set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - if (kthread_should_stop()) { - __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); - rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER; - return 0; - } + /* + * By the time the rescuer is requested to stop, the workqueue + * shouldn't have any work pending, but @wq->maydays may still have + * pwq(s) queued. This can happen by non-rescuer workers consuming + * all the work items before the rescuer got to them. Go through + * @wq->maydays processing before acting on should_stop so that the + * list is always empty on exit. + */ + should_stop = kthread_should_stop(); /* see whether any pwq is asking for help */ spin_lock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock); @@ -2459,6 +2464,12 @@ repeat: spin_unlock_irq(&wq_mayday_lock); + if (should_stop) { + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); + rescuer->task->flags &= ~PF_WQ_WORKER; + return 0; + } + /* rescuers should never participate in concurrency management */ WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rescuer->flags & WORKER_NOT_RUNNING)); schedule(); |
