diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 7 |
2 files changed, 14 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c index 1b8d98a..ff17c48 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c @@ -62,11 +62,12 @@ xfs_inobp_check( * has not had the inode cores stamped into it. Hence for readahead, the buffer * may be potentially invalid. * - * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we don't want to mark it with an error, - * but we do want to clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read - * will re-read it from disk. This will ensure that we don't get an unnecessary - * warnings during log recovery and we don't get unnecssary panics on debug - * kernels. + * If the readahead buffer is invalid, we need to mark it with an error and + * clear the DONE status of the buffer so that a followup read will re-read it + * from disk. We don't report the error otherwise to avoid warnings during log + * recovery and we don't get unnecssary panics on debug kernels. We use EIO here + * because all we want to do is say readahead failed; there is no-one to report + * the error to, so this will distinguish it from a non-ra verifier failure. */ static void xfs_inode_buf_verify( @@ -93,6 +94,7 @@ xfs_inode_buf_verify( XFS_RANDOM_ITOBP_INOTOBP))) { if (readahead) { bp->b_flags &= ~XBF_DONE; + xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, -EIO); return; } diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 45a8ea7..ae86b16 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -604,6 +604,13 @@ found: } } + /* + * Clear b_error if this is a lookup from a caller that doesn't expect + * valid data to be found in the buffer. + */ + if (!(flags & XBF_READ)) + xfs_buf_ioerror(bp, 0); + XFS_STATS_INC(target->bt_mount, xb_get); trace_xfs_buf_get(bp, flags, _RET_IP_); return bp; |
