diff options
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/ntfs.txt | 5 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ntfs/ChangeLog | 42 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ntfs/mft.c | 29 |
3 files changed, 65 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/ntfs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/ntfs.txt index 1415b96..eef4aca0 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/ntfs.txt +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/ntfs.txt @@ -451,9 +451,12 @@ Note, a technical ChangeLog aimed at kernel hackers is in fs/ntfs/ChangeLog. - Implement extension of resident files using the normal file write code paths, i.e. most very small files can be extended to be a little bit bigger but not by much. + - Add new mount option "disable_sparse". (See list of mount options + above for details.) - Improve handling of ntfs volumes with errors and strange boot sectors in particular. - - Fix various bugs. + - Fix various bugs including a nasty deadlock that appeared in recent + kernels (around 2.6.11-2.6.12 timeframe). 2.1.22: - Improve handling of ntfs volumes with errors. - Fix various bugs and race conditions. diff --git a/fs/ntfs/ChangeLog b/fs/ntfs/ChangeLog index 3d2cac4..9709fac 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/ChangeLog +++ b/fs/ntfs/ChangeLog @@ -132,6 +132,48 @@ ToDo/Notes: the already mapped runlist fragment which causes ntfs_mapping_pairs_decompress() to fail and return error. Update ntfs_attr_find_vcn_nolock() accordingly. + - Fix a nasty deadlock that appeared in recent kernels. + The situation: VFS inode X on a mounted ntfs volume is dirty. For + same inode X, the ntfs_inode is dirty and thus corresponding on-disk + inode, i.e. mft record, which is in a dirty PAGE_CACHE_PAGE belonging + to the table of inodes, i.e. $MFT, inode 0. + What happens: + Process 1: sys_sync()/umount()/whatever... calls + __sync_single_inode() for $MFT -> do_writepages() -> write_page for + the dirty page containing the on-disk inode X, the page is now locked + -> ntfs_write_mst_block() which clears PageUptodate() on the page to + prevent anyone else getting hold of it whilst it does the write out. + This is necessary as the on-disk inode needs "fixups" applied before + the write to disk which are removed again after the write and + PageUptodate is then set again. It then analyses the page looking + for dirty on-disk inodes and when it finds one it calls + ntfs_may_write_mft_record() to see if it is safe to write this + on-disk inode. This then calls ilookup5() to check if the + corresponding VFS inode is in icache(). This in turn calls ifind() + which waits on the inode lock via wait_on_inode whilst holding the + global inode_lock. + Process 2: pdflush results in a call to __sync_single_inode for the + same VFS inode X on the ntfs volume. This locks the inode (I_LOCK) + then calls write-inode -> ntfs_write_inode -> map_mft_record() -> + read_cache_page() for the page (in page cache of table of inodes + $MFT, inode 0) containing the on-disk inode. This page has + PageUptodate() clear because of Process 1 (see above) so + read_cache_page() blocks when it tries to take the page lock for the + page so it can call ntfs_read_page(). + Thus Process 1 is holding the page lock on the page containing the + on-disk inode X and it is waiting on the inode X to be unlocked in + ifind() so it can write the page out and then unlock the page. + And Process 2 is holding the inode lock on inode X and is waiting for + the page to be unlocked so it can call ntfs_readpage() or discover + that Process 1 set PageUptodate() again and use the page. + Thus we have a deadlock due to ifind() waiting on the inode lock. + The solution: The fix is to use the newly introduced + ilookup5_nowait() which does not wait on the inode's lock and hence + avoids the deadlock. This is safe as we do not care about the VFS + inode and only use the fact that it is in the VFS inode cache and the + fact that the vfs and ntfs inodes are one struct in memory to find + the ntfs inode in memory if present. Also, the ntfs inode has its + own locking so it does not matter if the vfs inode is locked. 2.1.22 - Many bug and race fixes and error handling improvements. diff --git a/fs/ntfs/mft.c b/fs/ntfs/mft.c index 3d0ba8e..ac9ff39 100644 --- a/fs/ntfs/mft.c +++ b/fs/ntfs/mft.c @@ -948,20 +948,23 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, na.name_len = 0; na.type = AT_UNUSED; /* - * For inode 0, i.e. $MFT itself, we cannot use ilookup5() from here or - * we deadlock because the inode is already locked by the kernel - * (fs/fs-writeback.c::__sync_single_inode()) and ilookup5() waits - * until the inode is unlocked before returning it and it never gets - * unlocked because ntfs_should_write_mft_record() never returns. )-: - * Fortunately, we have inode 0 pinned in icache for the duration of - * the mount so we can access it directly. + * Optimize inode 0, i.e. $MFT itself, since we have it in memory and + * we get here for it rather often. */ if (!mft_no) { /* Balance the below iput(). */ vi = igrab(mft_vi); BUG_ON(vi != mft_vi); - } else - vi = ilookup5(sb, mft_no, (test_t)ntfs_test_inode, &na); + } else { + /* + * Have to use ilookup5_nowait() since ilookup5() waits for the + * inode lock which causes ntfs to deadlock when a concurrent + * inode write via the inode dirty code paths and the page + * dirty code path of the inode dirty code path when writing + * $MFT occurs. + */ + vi = ilookup5_nowait(sb, mft_no, (test_t)ntfs_test_inode, &na); + } if (vi) { ntfs_debug("Base inode 0x%lx is in icache.", mft_no); /* The inode is in icache. */ @@ -1016,7 +1019,13 @@ BOOL ntfs_may_write_mft_record(ntfs_volume *vol, const unsigned long mft_no, na.mft_no = MREF_LE(m->base_mft_record); ntfs_debug("Mft record 0x%lx is an extent record. Looking for base " "inode 0x%lx in icache.", mft_no, na.mft_no); - vi = ilookup5(sb, na.mft_no, (test_t)ntfs_test_inode, &na); + if (!na.mft_no) { + /* Balance the below iput(). */ + vi = igrab(mft_vi); + BUG_ON(vi != mft_vi); + } else + vi = ilookup5_nowait(sb, na.mft_no, (test_t)ntfs_test_inode, + &na); if (!vi) { /* * The base inode is not in icache, write this extent mft |