diff options
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c | 98 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 46 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c index c29ac1c..3a3d5bc 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/lu_object.c @@ -1779,7 +1779,6 @@ int lu_env_refill_by_tags(struct lu_env *env, __u32 ctags, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(lu_env_refill_by_tags); -static struct shrinker *lu_site_shrinker = NULL; typedef struct lu_site_stats{ unsigned lss_populated; @@ -1835,61 +1834,68 @@ static void lu_site_stats_get(cfs_hash_t *hs, * objects without taking the lu_sites_guard lock, but this is not * possible in the current implementation. */ -static int lu_cache_shrink(SHRINKER_ARGS(sc, nr_to_scan, gfp_mask)) +static unsigned long lu_cache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *sk, + struct shrink_control *sc) { lu_site_stats_t stats; struct lu_site *s; struct lu_site *tmp; - int cached = 0; - int remain = shrink_param(sc, nr_to_scan); - LIST_HEAD(splice); - - if (!(shrink_param(sc, gfp_mask) & __GFP_FS)) { - if (remain != 0) - return -1; - else - /* We must not take the lu_sites_guard lock when - * __GFP_FS is *not* set because of the deadlock - * possibility detailed above. Additionally, - * since we cannot determine the number of - * objects in the cache without taking this - * lock, we're in a particularly tough spot. As - * a result, we'll just lie and say our cache is - * empty. This _should_ be ok, as we can't - * reclaim objects when __GFP_FS is *not* set - * anyways. - */ - return 0; - } + unsigned long cached = 0; - CDEBUG(D_INODE, "Shrink %d objects\n", remain); + if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) + return 0; mutex_lock(&lu_sites_guard); list_for_each_entry_safe(s, tmp, &lu_sites, ls_linkage) { - if (shrink_param(sc, nr_to_scan) != 0) { - remain = lu_site_purge(&lu_shrink_env, s, remain); - /* - * Move just shrunk site to the tail of site list to - * assure shrinking fairness. - */ - list_move_tail(&s->ls_linkage, &splice); - } - memset(&stats, 0, sizeof(stats)); lu_site_stats_get(s->ls_obj_hash, &stats, 0); cached += stats.lss_total - stats.lss_busy; - if (shrink_param(sc, nr_to_scan) && remain <= 0) - break; } - list_splice(&splice, lu_sites.prev); mutex_unlock(&lu_sites_guard); cached = (cached / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure; - if (shrink_param(sc, nr_to_scan) == 0) - CDEBUG(D_INODE, "%d objects cached\n", cached); + CDEBUG(D_INODE, "%ld objects cached\n", cached); return cached; } +static unsigned long lu_cache_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *sk, + struct shrink_control *sc) +{ + struct lu_site *s; + struct lu_site *tmp; + unsigned long remain = sc->nr_to_scan, freed = 0; + LIST_HEAD(splice); + + if (!(sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) + /* We must not take the lu_sites_guard lock when + * __GFP_FS is *not* set because of the deadlock + * possibility detailed above. Additionally, + * since we cannot determine the number of + * objects in the cache without taking this + * lock, we're in a particularly tough spot. As + * a result, we'll just lie and say our cache is + * empty. This _should_ be ok, as we can't + * reclaim objects when __GFP_FS is *not* set + * anyways. + */ + return SHRINK_STOP; + + mutex_lock(&lu_sites_guard); + list_for_each_entry_safe(s, tmp, &lu_sites, ls_linkage) { + freed = lu_site_purge(&lu_shrink_env, s, remain); + remain -= freed; + /* + * Move just shrunk site to the tail of site list to + * assure shrinking fairness. + */ + list_move_tail(&s->ls_linkage, &splice); + } + list_splice(&splice, lu_sites.prev); + mutex_unlock(&lu_sites_guard); + + return sc->nr_to_scan - remain; +} + /* * Debugging stuff. */ @@ -1913,6 +1919,12 @@ int lu_printk_printer(const struct lu_env *env, return 0; } +static struct shrinker lu_site_shrinker = { + .count_objects = lu_cache_shrink_count, + .scan_objects = lu_cache_shrink_scan, + .seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS, +}; + /** * Initialization of global lu_* data. */ @@ -1947,9 +1959,7 @@ int lu_global_init(void) * inode, one for ea. Unfortunately setting this high value results in * lu_object/inode cache consuming all the memory. */ - lu_site_shrinker = set_shrinker(DEFAULT_SEEKS, lu_cache_shrink); - if (lu_site_shrinker == NULL) - return -ENOMEM; + register_shrinker(&lu_site_shrinker); return result; } @@ -1959,11 +1969,7 @@ int lu_global_init(void) */ void lu_global_fini(void) { - if (lu_site_shrinker != NULL) { - remove_shrinker(lu_site_shrinker); - lu_site_shrinker = NULL; - } - + unregister_shrinker(&lu_site_shrinker); lu_context_key_degister(&lu_global_key); /* |