diff options
| author | Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com> | 2017-08-08 12:05:32 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2017-08-08 10:57:43 +0200 |
| commit | 199b5763d329b43c88f6ad539db8a6c6b42f8edb (patch) | |
| tree | 224f4ebeb9e58c43ea1916e63e813452f81dd45a /virt/kvm/arm | |
| parent | 1b4d56b86a370a3785a33eba23e2e3009f5a03af (diff) | |
| download | op-kernel-dev-199b5763d329b43c88f6ad539db8a6c6b42f8edb.zip op-kernel-dev-199b5763d329b43c88f6ad539db8a6c6b42f8edb.tar.gz | |
KVM: add spinlock optimization framework
If a vcpu exits due to request a user mode spinlock, then
the spinlock-holder may be preempted in user mode or kernel mode.
(Note that not all architectures trap spin loops in user mode,
only AMD x86 and ARM/ARM64 currently do).
But if a vcpu exits in kernel mode, then the holder must be
preempted in kernel mode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernel mode
as a more likely candidate for the lock holder.
This introduces kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel() to decide whether the
vcpu is in kernel-mode when it's preempted. kvm_vcpu_on_spin's
new argument says the same of the spinning VCPU.
Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'virt/kvm/arm')
| -rw-r--r-- | virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index a39a1e1..862f820 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -416,6 +416,11 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *v) && !v->arch.power_off && !v->arch.pause); } +bool kvm_arch_vcpu_in_kernel(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return false; +} + /* Just ensure a guest exit from a particular CPU */ static void exit_vm_noop(void *info) { |
