diff options
author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> | 2012-12-11 08:56:16 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2012-12-20 13:57:04 -0500 |
commit | 582aa64a04a579d47d05e4a0ee85bf047978ef4d (patch) | |
tree | 96c742c282b0ee6787d99704687326084a744487 /scripts | |
parent | 1e75529e3c6c18dc535f38454173c4f2dfa99685 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-582aa64a04a579d47d05e4a0ee85bf047978ef4d.zip op-kernel-dev-582aa64a04a579d47d05e4a0ee85bf047978ef4d.tar.gz |
vfs: remove unneeded permission check from path_init
When path_init is called with a valid dfd, that code checks permissions
on the open directory fd and returns an error if the check fails. This
permission check is redundant, however.
Both callers of path_init immediately call link_path_walk afterward. The
first thing that link_path_walk does for pathnames that do not consist
only of slashes is to check for exec permissions at the starting point of
the path walk. And this check in path_init() is on the path taken only
when *name != '/' && *name != '\0'.
In most cases, these checks are very quick, but when the dfd is for a
file on a NFS mount with the actimeo=0, each permission check goes
out onto the wire. The result is 2 identical ACCESS calls.
Given that these codepaths are fairly "hot", I think it makes sense to
eliminate the permission check in path_init and simply assume that the
caller will eventually check the permissions before proceeding.
Reported-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions