selinux: add gfp argument to security_xfrm_policy_alloc and fix callers

security_xfrm_policy_alloc can be called in atomic context so the
allocation should be done with GFP_ATOMIC. Add an argument to let the
callers choose the appropriate way. In order to do so a gfp argument
needs to be added to the method xfrm_policy_alloc_security in struct
security_operations and to the internal function
selinux_xfrm_alloc_user. After that switch to GFP_ATOMIC in the atomic
callers and leave GFP_KERNEL as before for the rest.
The path that needed the gfp argument addition is:
security_xfrm_policy_alloc -> security_ops.xfrm_policy_alloc_security ->
all users of xfrm_policy_alloc_security (e.g. selinux_xfrm_policy_alloc) ->
selinux_xfrm_alloc_user (here the allocation used to be GFP_KERNEL only)

Now adding a gfp argument to selinux_xfrm_alloc_user requires us to also
add it to security_context_to_sid which is used inside and prior to this
patch did only GFP_KERNEL allocation. So add gfp argument to
security_context_to_sid and adjust all of its callers as well.

CC: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
CC: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
CC: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
CC: Fan Du <fan.du@windriver.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: LSM list <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
CC: SELinux list <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>

2 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c
index 1526023..7932697 100644
--- a/net/key/af_key.c
+++ b/net/key/af_key.c
@@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ static int pfkey_spdadd(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sadb_
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&xp->security, uctx);
+		err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&xp->security, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
 		kfree(uctx);
 
 		if (err)
@@ -2341,7 +2341,7 @@ static int pfkey_spddelete(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sa
 		if (!uctx)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&pol_ctx, uctx);
+		err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&pol_ctx, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
 		kfree(uctx);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
@@ -3241,7 +3241,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *pfkey_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
 		if ((*dir = verify_sec_ctx_len(p)))
 			goto out;
 		uctx = pfkey_sadb2xfrm_user_sec_ctx(sec_ctx, GFP_ATOMIC);
-		*dir = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&xp->security, uctx);
+		*dir = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&xp->security, uctx, GFP_ATOMIC);
 		kfree(uctx);
 
 		if (*dir)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index c274179..2f7ddc3 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ static int copy_from_user_sec_ctx(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs
 		return 0;
 
 	uctx = nla_data(rt);
-	return security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&pol->security, uctx);
+	return security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&pol->security, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
 }
 
 static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
@@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		if (rt) {
 			struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
 
-			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx);
+			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		}
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@ static int xfrm_add_pol_expire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		if (rt) {
 			struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *uctx = nla_data(rt);
 
-			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx);
+			err = security_xfrm_policy_alloc(&ctx, uctx, GFP_KERNEL);
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		}