[XFRM]: Export SAD info.

On a system with a lot of SAs, counting SAD entries chews useful
CPU time since you need to dump the whole SAD to user space;
i.e something like ip xfrm state ls | grep -i src | wc -l
I have seen taking literally minutes on a 40K SAs when the system
is swapping.
With this patch, some of the SAD info (that was already being tracked)
is exposed to user space. i.e you do:
ip xfrm state count
And you get the count; you can also pass -s to the command line and
get the hash info.

Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

2 files changed, 66 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 743f07e..f3a61eb 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -421,6 +421,16 @@ restart:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_flush);
 
+void xfrm_sad_getinfo(struct xfrm_sadinfo *si)
+{
+	spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
+	si->sadcnt = xfrm_state_num;
+	si->sadhcnt = xfrm_state_hmask;
+	si->sadhmcnt = xfrm_state_hashmax;
+	spin_unlock_bh(&xfrm_state_lock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_sad_getinfo);
+
 static int
 xfrm_init_tempsel(struct xfrm_state *x, struct flowi *fl,
 		  struct xfrm_tmpl *tmpl,
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index f91521d..cb4cc1b 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -672,6 +672,61 @@ static struct sk_buff *xfrm_state_netlink(struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static int build_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq, u32 flags)
+{
+	struct xfrm_sadinfo si;
+	struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
+	u32 *f;
+
+	nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, pid, seq, XFRM_MSG_NEWSADINFO, sizeof(u32), 0);
+	if (nlh == NULL) /* shouldnt really happen ... */
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	f = nlmsg_data(nlh);
+	*f = flags;
+	xfrm_sad_getinfo(&si);
+
+	if (flags & XFRM_SAD_HMASK)
+		NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_SADHMASK, si.sadhcnt);
+	if (flags & XFRM_SAD_HMAX)
+		NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_SADHMAX, si.sadhmcnt);
+	if (flags & XFRM_SAD_CNT)
+		NLA_PUT_U32(skb, XFRMA_SADCNT, si.sadcnt);
+
+	return nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
+
+nla_put_failure:
+	nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
+	return -EMSGSIZE;
+}
+
+static int xfrm_get_sadinfo(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+		struct rtattr **xfrma)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *r_skb;
+	u32 *flags = NLMSG_DATA(nlh);
+	u32 spid = NETLINK_CB(skb).pid;
+	u32 seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
+	int len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(u32));
+
+	if (*flags & XFRM_SAD_HMASK)
+		len += RTA_SPACE(sizeof(u32));
+	if (*flags & XFRM_SAD_HMAX)
+		len += RTA_SPACE(sizeof(u32));
+	if (*flags & XFRM_SAD_CNT)
+		len += RTA_SPACE(sizeof(u32));
+
+	r_skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+	if (r_skb == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (build_sadinfo(r_skb, spid, seq, *flags) < 0)
+		BUG();
+
+	return nlmsg_unicast(xfrm_nl, r_skb, spid);
+}
+
 static int xfrm_get_sa(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 		struct rtattr **xfrma)
 {
@@ -1850,6 +1905,7 @@ static struct xfrm_link {
 	[XFRM_MSG_NEWAE       - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_new_ae  },
 	[XFRM_MSG_GETAE       - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_ae  },
 	[XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE     - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_do_migrate    },
+	[XFRM_MSG_GETSADINFO  - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_sadinfo    },
 };
 
 static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)