cfg80211: advertise possible interface combinations

Add the ability to advertise interface combinations in nl80211.
This allows the driver to indicate what the combinations are
that it supports. "Combinations" of just a single interface are
implicit, as previously. Note that cfg80211 will enforce that
the restrictions are met, but not for all drivers yet (once all
drivers are updated, we can remove the flag and enforce for all).

When no combinations are actually supported, an empty list will
be exported so that userspace can know if the kernel exported
this info or not (although it isn't clear to me what tools using
the info should do if the kernel didn't export it).

Since some interface types are purely virtual/software and don't
fit the restrictions, those are exposed in a new list of pure SW
types, not subject to restrictions. This mainly exists to handle
AP-VLAN and monitor interfaces in mac80211.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

1 files changed, 80 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 414c9f6..95e4e25 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -803,6 +803,11 @@ int cfg80211_change_iface(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 		return -EBUSY;
 
 	if (ntype != otype) {
+		err = cfg80211_can_change_interface(rdev, dev->ieee80211_ptr,
+						    ntype);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+
 		dev->ieee80211_ptr->use_4addr = false;
 		dev->ieee80211_ptr->mesh_id_up_len = 0;
 
@@ -921,3 +926,78 @@ int cfg80211_validate_beacon_int(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 
 	return res;
 }
+
+int cfg80211_can_change_interface(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
+				  struct wireless_dev *wdev,
+				  enum nl80211_iftype iftype)
+{
+	struct wireless_dev *wdev_iter;
+	int num[NUM_NL80211_IFTYPES];
+	int total = 1;
+	int i, j;
+
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+	/* Always allow software iftypes */
+	if (rdev->wiphy.software_iftypes & BIT(iftype))
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * Drivers will gradually all set this flag, until all
+	 * have it we only enforce for those that set it.
+	 */
+	if (!(rdev->wiphy.flags & WIPHY_FLAG_ENFORCE_COMBINATIONS))
+		return 0;
+
+	memset(num, 0, sizeof(num));
+
+	num[iftype] = 1;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
+	list_for_each_entry(wdev_iter, &rdev->netdev_list, list) {
+		if (wdev_iter == wdev)
+			continue;
+		if (!netif_running(wdev_iter->netdev))
+			continue;
+
+		if (rdev->wiphy.software_iftypes & BIT(wdev_iter->iftype))
+			continue;
+
+		num[wdev_iter->iftype]++;
+		total++;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < rdev->wiphy.n_iface_combinations; i++) {
+		const struct ieee80211_iface_combination *c;
+		struct ieee80211_iface_limit *limits;
+
+		c = &rdev->wiphy.iface_combinations[i];
+
+		limits = kmemdup(c->limits, sizeof(limits[0]) * c->n_limits,
+				 GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!limits)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		if (total > c->max_interfaces)
+			goto cont;
+
+		for (iftype = 0; iftype < NUM_NL80211_IFTYPES; iftype++) {
+			if (rdev->wiphy.software_iftypes & BIT(iftype))
+				continue;
+			for (j = 0; j < c->n_limits; j++) {
+				if (!(limits[j].types & iftype))
+					continue;
+				if (limits[j].max < num[iftype])
+					goto cont;
+				limits[j].max -= num[iftype];
+			}
+		}
+		/* yay, it fits */
+		kfree(limits);
+		return 0;
+ cont:
+		kfree(limits);
+	}
+
+	return -EBUSY;
+}