diff options
author | Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> | 2013-12-11 13:48:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2013-12-11 16:02:58 -0500 |
commit | 7e9805696428113e34625a65a30dbc62cb78acc5 (patch) | |
tree | 3d5c13ae988049a6b4e53ff586826ee7779627a6 /net/ipv6/route.c | |
parent | e47726683803616c773bc75c88cfb3eb54a8172b (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-7e9805696428113e34625a65a30dbc62cb78acc5.zip op-kernel-dev-7e9805696428113e34625a65a30dbc62cb78acc5.tar.gz |
ipv6: router reachability probing
RFC 4191 states in 3.5:
When a host avoids using any non-reachable router X and instead sends
a data packet to another router Y, and the host would have used
router X if router X were reachable, then the host SHOULD probe each
such router X's reachability by sending a single Neighbor
Solicitation to that router's address. A host MUST NOT probe a
router's reachability in the absence of useful traffic that the host
would have sent to the router if it were reachable. In any case,
these probes MUST be rate-limited to no more than one per minute per
router.
Currently, when the neighbour corresponding to a router falls into
NUD_FAILED, it's never considered again. Introduce a new rt6_nud_state
value, RT6_NUD_FAIL_PROBE, which suggests the route should not be used but
should be probed with a single NS. The probe is ratelimited by the existing
code. To better distinguish meanings of the failure values, rename
RT6_NUD_FAIL_SOFT to RT6_NUD_FAIL_DO_RR.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ipv6/route.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/ipv6/route.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index ddb9d41..a1a5752 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -66,8 +66,9 @@ #endif enum rt6_nud_state { - RT6_NUD_FAIL_HARD = -2, - RT6_NUD_FAIL_SOFT = -1, + RT6_NUD_FAIL_HARD = -3, + RT6_NUD_FAIL_PROBE = -2, + RT6_NUD_FAIL_DO_RR = -1, RT6_NUD_SUCCEED = 1 }; @@ -521,7 +522,7 @@ static void rt6_probe(struct rt6_info *rt) work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC); if (neigh && work) - neigh->updated = jiffies; + __neigh_set_probe_once(neigh); if (neigh) write_unlock(&neigh->lock); @@ -577,11 +578,13 @@ static inline enum rt6_nud_state rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt) #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF else if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_FAILED)) ret = RT6_NUD_SUCCEED; + else + ret = RT6_NUD_FAIL_PROBE; #endif read_unlock(&neigh->lock); } else { ret = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF) ? - RT6_NUD_SUCCEED : RT6_NUD_FAIL_SOFT; + RT6_NUD_SUCCEED : RT6_NUD_FAIL_DO_RR; } rcu_read_unlock_bh(); @@ -618,16 +621,17 @@ static struct rt6_info *find_match(struct rt6_info *rt, int oif, int strict, goto out; m = rt6_score_route(rt, oif, strict); - if (m == RT6_NUD_FAIL_SOFT) { + if (m == RT6_NUD_FAIL_DO_RR) { match_do_rr = true; m = 0; /* lowest valid score */ - } else if (m < 0) { + } else if (m == RT6_NUD_FAIL_HARD) { goto out; } if (strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_REACHABLE) rt6_probe(rt); + /* note that m can be RT6_NUD_FAIL_PROBE at this point */ if (m > *mpri) { *do_rr = match_do_rr; *mpri = m; |