Merge branch 'listener_refactor_part_11'

Eric Dumazet says:

====================
inet: tcp listener refactoring, part 11

Before inserting request sockets into general (ehash) table,
we need to prepare netfilter to cope with them, as they are
not full sockets.

I'll later change xt_socket to get full support, including for
request sockets (NEW_SYN_RECV)

Save 8 bytes in inet_request_sock on 64bit arches. We'll soon add
a pointer to the listener socket.

I included two TCP changes in this patch series.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 55 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 717d437..7257eb2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3321,6 +3321,36 @@ static int tcp_ack_update_window(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, u32
 	return flag;
 }
 
+/* Return true if we're currently rate-limiting out-of-window ACKs and
+ * thus shouldn't send a dupack right now. We rate-limit dupacks in
+ * response to out-of-window SYNs or ACKs to mitigate ACK loops or DoS
+ * attacks that send repeated SYNs or ACKs for the same connection. To
+ * do this, we do not send a duplicate SYNACK or ACK if the remote
+ * endpoint is sending out-of-window SYNs or pure ACKs at a high rate.
+ */
+bool tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
+			  int mib_idx, u32 *last_oow_ack_time)
+{
+	/* Data packets without SYNs are not likely part of an ACK loop. */
+	if ((TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq) &&
+	    !tcp_hdr(skb)->syn)
+		goto not_rate_limited;
+
+	if (*last_oow_ack_time) {
+		s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_time_stamp - *last_oow_ack_time);
+
+		if (0 <= elapsed && elapsed < sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit) {
+			NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, mib_idx);
+			return true;	/* rate-limited: don't send yet! */
+		}
+	}
+
+	*last_oow_ack_time = tcp_time_stamp;
+
+not_rate_limited:
+	return false;	/* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */
+}
+
 /* RFC 5961 7 [ACK Throttling] */
 static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
@@ -5912,6 +5942,31 @@ static void tcp_ecn_create_request(struct request_sock *req,
 		inet_rsk(req)->ecn_ok = 1;
 }
 
+static void tcp_openreq_init(struct request_sock *req,
+			     const struct tcp_options_received *rx_opt,
+			     struct sk_buff *skb, const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct inet_request_sock *ireq = inet_rsk(req);
+
+	req->rcv_wnd = 0;		/* So that tcp_send_synack() knows! */
+	req->cookie_ts = 0;
+	tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq;
+	tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_nxt = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1;
+	tcp_rsk(req)->snt_synack = tcp_time_stamp;
+	tcp_rsk(req)->last_oow_ack_time = 0;
+	req->mss = rx_opt->mss_clamp;
+	req->ts_recent = rx_opt->saw_tstamp ? rx_opt->rcv_tsval : 0;
+	ireq->tstamp_ok = rx_opt->tstamp_ok;
+	ireq->sack_ok = rx_opt->sack_ok;
+	ireq->snd_wscale = rx_opt->snd_wscale;
+	ireq->wscale_ok = rx_opt->wscale_ok;
+	ireq->acked = 0;
+	ireq->ecn_ok = 0;
+	ireq->ir_rmt_port = tcp_hdr(skb)->source;
+	ireq->ir_num = ntohs(tcp_hdr(skb)->dest);
+	ireq->ir_mark = inet_request_mark(sk, skb);
+}
+
 int tcp_conn_request(struct request_sock_ops *rsk_ops,
 		     const struct tcp_request_sock_ops *af_ops,
 		     struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)