diff options
author | Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> | 2008-07-13 11:51:40 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> | 2008-07-13 11:51:40 +0100 |
commit | 2013c7e35aeba39777f9b3eef8a70207b3931152 (patch) | |
tree | 5d63ce9f8c512ffd17b8084002e6dc0e0f998b84 /net/dccp/ccids/lib | |
parent | 79d16385c7f287a33ea771c4dbe60ae43f791b49 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-2013c7e35aeba39777f9b3eef8a70207b3931152.zip op-kernel-dev-2013c7e35aeba39777f9b3eef8a70207b3931152.tar.gz |
dccp ccid-3: Fix error in loss detection
The TFRC loss detection code used the wrong loss condition (RFC 4340, 7.7.1):
* the difference between sequence numbers s1 and s2 instead of
* the number of packets missing between s1 and s2 (one less than the distance).
Since this condition appears in many places of the code, it has been put into a
separate function, dccp_loss_free().
Further changes:
----------------
* tidied up incorrect typing (it was using `int' for u64/s64 types);
* optimised conditional statements for common case of non-reordered packets;
* rewrote comments/documentation to match the changes.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/dccp/ccids/lib')
-rw-r--r-- | net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c | 73 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c index 20af1a6..8b5c41e 100644 --- a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.c @@ -215,22 +215,19 @@ static void __one_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n2 u64 s0 = tfrc_rx_hist_loss_prev(h)->tfrchrx_seqno, s1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_seqno, s2 = DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq; - int n1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_ndp, - d12 = dccp_delta_seqno(s1, s2), d2; - if (d12 > 0) { /* S1 < S2 */ + if (likely(dccp_delta_seqno(s1, s2) > 0)) { /* S1 < S2 */ h->loss_count = 2; tfrc_rx_hist_entry_from_skb(tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2), skb, n2); return; } /* S0 < S2 < S1 */ - d2 = dccp_delta_seqno(s0, s2); - if (d2 == 1 || n2 >= d2) { /* S2 is direct successor of S0 */ - int d21 = -d12; + if (dccp_loss_free(s0, s2, n2)) { + u64 n1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_ndp; - if (d21 == 1 || n1 >= d21) { + if (dccp_loss_free(s2, s1, n1)) { /* hole is filled: S0, S2, and S1 are consecutive */ h->loss_count = 0; h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 1); @@ -238,9 +235,9 @@ static void __one_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n2 /* gap between S2 and S1: just update loss_prev */ tfrc_rx_hist_entry_from_skb(tfrc_rx_hist_loss_prev(h), skb, n2); - } else { /* hole between S0 and S2 */ + } else { /* gap between S0 and S2 */ /* - * Reorder history to insert S2 between S0 and s1 + * Reorder history to insert S2 between S0 and S1 */ tfrc_rx_hist_swap(h, 0, 3); h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 3); @@ -256,22 +253,18 @@ static int __two_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n3) s1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_seqno, s2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_seqno, s3 = DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq; - int n1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_ndp, - d23 = dccp_delta_seqno(s2, s3), d13, d3, d31; - if (d23 > 0) { /* S2 < S3 */ + if (likely(dccp_delta_seqno(s2, s3) > 0)) { /* S2 < S3 */ h->loss_count = 3; tfrc_rx_hist_entry_from_skb(tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 3), skb, n3); return 1; } /* S3 < S2 */ - d13 = dccp_delta_seqno(s1, s3); - if (d13 > 0) { + if (dccp_delta_seqno(s1, s3) > 0) { /* S1 < S3 < S2 */ /* - * The sequence number order is S1, S3, S2 - * Reorder history to insert entry between S1 and S2 + * Reorder history to insert S3 between S1 and S2 */ tfrc_rx_hist_swap(h, 2, 3); tfrc_rx_hist_entry_from_skb(tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2), skb, n3); @@ -280,17 +273,15 @@ static int __two_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n3) } /* S0 < S3 < S1 */ - d31 = -d13; - d3 = dccp_delta_seqno(s0, s3); - if (d3 == 1 || n3 >= d3) { /* S3 is a successor of S0 */ + if (dccp_loss_free(s0, s3, n3)) { + u64 n1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_ndp; - if (d31 == 1 || n1 >= d31) { + if (dccp_loss_free(s3, s1, n1)) { /* hole between S0 and S1 filled by S3 */ - int d2 = dccp_delta_seqno(s1, s2), - n2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_ndp; + u64 n2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_ndp; - if (d2 == 1 || n2 >= d2) { + if (dccp_loss_free(s1, s2, n2)) { /* entire hole filled by S0, S3, S1, S2 */ h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 2); h->loss_count = 0; @@ -307,8 +298,8 @@ static int __two_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n3) } /* - * The remaining case: S3 is not a successor of S0. - * Sequence order is S0, S3, S1, S2; reorder to insert between S0 and S1 + * The remaining case: S0 < S3 < S1 < S2; gap between S0 and S3 + * Reorder history to insert S3 between S0 and S1. */ tfrc_rx_hist_swap(h, 0, 3); h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 3); @@ -318,33 +309,25 @@ static int __two_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, struct sk_buff *skb, u32 n3) return 1; } -/* return the signed modulo-2^48 sequence number distance from entry e1 to e2 */ -static s64 tfrc_rx_hist_delta_seqno(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h, u8 e1, u8 e2) -{ - DCCP_BUG_ON(e1 > h->loss_count || e2 > h->loss_count); - - return dccp_delta_seqno(tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, e1)->tfrchrx_seqno, - tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, e2)->tfrchrx_seqno); -} - /* recycle RX history records to continue loss detection if necessary */ static void __three_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h) { /* - * The distance between S0 and S1 is always greater than 1 and the NDP - * count of S1 is smaller than this distance. Otherwise there would - * have been no loss. Hence it is only necessary to see whether there - * are further missing data packets between S1/S2 and S2/S3. + * At this stage we know already that there is a gap between S0 and S1 + * (since S0 was the highest sequence number received before detecting + * the loss). To recycle the loss record, it is thus only necessary to + * check for other possible gaps between S1/S2 and between S2/S3. */ - int d2 = tfrc_rx_hist_delta_seqno(h, 1, 2), - d3 = tfrc_rx_hist_delta_seqno(h, 2, 3), - n2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_ndp, + u64 s1 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 1)->tfrchrx_seqno, + s2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_seqno, + s3 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 3)->tfrchrx_seqno; + u64 n2 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 2)->tfrchrx_ndp, n3 = tfrc_rx_hist_entry(h, 3)->tfrchrx_ndp; - if (d2 == 1 || n2 >= d2) { /* S2 is successor to S1 */ + if (dccp_loss_free(s1, s2, n2)) { - if (d3 == 1 || n3 >= d3) { - /* S3 is successor of S2: entire hole is filled */ + if (dccp_loss_free(s2, s3, n3)) { + /* no gap between S2 and S3: entire hole is filled */ h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 3); h->loss_count = 0; } else { @@ -353,7 +336,7 @@ static void __three_after_loss(struct tfrc_rx_hist *h) h->loss_count = 1; } - } else { /* gap between S1 and S2 */ + } else { /* gap between S1 and S2 */ h->loss_start = tfrc_rx_hist_index(h, 1); h->loss_count = 2; } |