diff options
author | Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org> | 2011-12-21 16:12:12 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi> | 2011-12-22 14:18:59 -0200 |
commit | 2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5 (patch) | |
tree | ea075313e9f03379ee1313ca230b07dadd937dad /net/bluetooth | |
parent | 371fd83563252f550ce59476a7366d0b5171d316 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5.zip op-kernel-dev-2b64d153a0cc9d2b60e47be013cde8490f16e0a5.tar.gz |
Bluetooth: Add MITM mechanism to LE-SMP
To achive Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) level security with Low Energy,
we have to enable User Passkey Comparison. This commit modifies the
hard-coded JUST-WORKS pairing mechanism to support query via the MGMT
interface of Passkey comparison and User Confirmation.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gix <bgix@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann<marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth')
-rw-r--r-- | net/bluetooth/smp.c | 226 |
1 files changed, 204 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c index 0ee2905..9fea4bf 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h> #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h> #include <net/bluetooth/l2cap.h> +#include <net/bluetooth/mgmt.h> #include <net/bluetooth/smp.h> #include <linux/crypto.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> @@ -189,24 +190,45 @@ static void smp_send_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 code, u16 len, void *data) msecs_to_jiffies(SMP_TIMEOUT)); } +static __u8 authreq_to_seclevel(__u8 authreq) +{ + if (authreq & SMP_AUTH_MITM) + return BT_SECURITY_HIGH; + else + return BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM; +} + +static __u8 seclevel_to_authreq(__u8 sec_level) +{ + switch (sec_level) { + case BT_SECURITY_HIGH: + return SMP_AUTH_MITM | SMP_AUTH_BONDING; + case BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM: + return SMP_AUTH_BONDING; + default: + return SMP_AUTH_NONE; + } +} + static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, struct smp_cmd_pairing *rsp, __u8 authreq) { - u8 dist_keys; + u8 dist_keys = 0; - dist_keys = 0; if (test_bit(HCI_PAIRABLE, &conn->hcon->hdev->flags)) { dist_keys = SMP_DIST_ENC_KEY; authreq |= SMP_AUTH_BONDING; + } else { + authreq &= ~SMP_AUTH_BONDING; } if (rsp == NULL) { req->io_capability = conn->hcon->io_capability; req->oob_flag = SMP_OOB_NOT_PRESENT; req->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE; - req->init_key_dist = dist_keys; + req->init_key_dist = 0; req->resp_key_dist = dist_keys; req->auth_req = authreq; return; @@ -215,7 +237,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn, rsp->io_capability = conn->hcon->io_capability; rsp->oob_flag = SMP_OOB_NOT_PRESENT; rsp->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE; - rsp->init_key_dist = req->init_key_dist & dist_keys; + rsp->init_key_dist = 0; rsp->resp_key_dist = req->resp_key_dist & dist_keys; rsp->auth_req = authreq; } @@ -245,6 +267,95 @@ static void smp_failure(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 reason, u8 send) smp_chan_destroy(conn); } +#define JUST_WORKS 0x00 +#define JUST_CFM 0x01 +#define REQ_PASSKEY 0x02 +#define CFM_PASSKEY 0x03 +#define REQ_OOB 0x04 +#define OVERLAP 0xFF + +static const u8 gen_method[5][5] = { + { JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, REQ_PASSKEY }, + { JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, REQ_PASSKEY }, + { CFM_PASSKEY, CFM_PASSKEY, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, CFM_PASSKEY }, + { JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM, JUST_WORKS, JUST_WORKS, JUST_CFM }, + { CFM_PASSKEY, CFM_PASSKEY, REQ_PASSKEY, JUST_WORKS, OVERLAP }, +}; + +static int tk_request(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 remote_oob, u8 auth, + u8 local_io, u8 remote_io) +{ + struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon; + struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan; + u8 method; + u32 passkey = 0; + int ret = 0; + + /* Initialize key for JUST WORKS */ + memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk)); + clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->smp_flags); + + BT_DBG("tk_request: auth:%d lcl:%d rem:%d", auth, local_io, remote_io); + + /* If neither side wants MITM, use JUST WORKS */ + /* If either side has unknown io_caps, use JUST WORKS */ + /* Otherwise, look up method from the table */ + if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_MITM) || + local_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY || + remote_io > SMP_IO_KEYBOARD_DISPLAY) + method = JUST_WORKS; + else + method = gen_method[local_io][remote_io]; + + /* If not bonding, don't ask user to confirm a Zero TK */ + if (!(auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) && method == JUST_CFM) + method = JUST_WORKS; + + /* If Just Works, Continue with Zero TK */ + if (method == JUST_WORKS) { + set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->smp_flags); + return 0; + } + + /* Not Just Works/Confirm results in MITM Authentication */ + if (method != JUST_CFM) + set_bit(SMP_FLAG_MITM_AUTH, &smp->smp_flags); + + /* If both devices have Keyoard-Display I/O, the master + * Confirms and the slave Enters the passkey. + */ + if (method == OVERLAP) { + if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) + method = CFM_PASSKEY; + else + method = REQ_PASSKEY; + } + + /* Generate random passkey. Not valid until confirmed. */ + if (method == CFM_PASSKEY) { + u8 key[16]; + + memset(key, 0, sizeof(key)); + get_random_bytes(&passkey, sizeof(passkey)); + passkey %= 1000000; + put_unaligned_le32(passkey, key); + swap128(key, smp->tk); + BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", passkey); + } + + hci_dev_lock(hcon->hdev); + + if (method == REQ_PASSKEY) + ret = mgmt_user_passkey_request(hcon->hdev, conn->dst); + else + ret = mgmt_user_confirm_request(hcon->hdev, conn->dst, + cpu_to_le32(passkey), 0); + + hci_dev_unlock(hcon->hdev); + + return ret; +} + static void confirm_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct smp_chan *smp = container_of(work, struct smp_chan, confirm); @@ -277,6 +388,8 @@ static void confirm_work(struct work_struct *work) goto error; } + clear_bit(SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING, &smp->smp_flags); + swap128(res, cp.confirm_val); smp_send_cmd(smp->conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_CONFIRM, sizeof(cp), &cp); @@ -382,6 +495,7 @@ static struct smp_chan *smp_chan_create(struct l2cap_conn *conn) smp->conn = conn; conn->smp_chan = smp; + conn->hcon->smp_conn = conn; hci_conn_hold(conn->hcon); @@ -399,18 +513,64 @@ void smp_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_conn *conn) kfree(smp); conn->smp_chan = NULL; + conn->hcon->smp_conn = NULL; hci_conn_put(conn->hcon); } +int smp_user_confirm_reply(struct hci_conn *hcon, u16 mgmt_op, __le32 passkey) +{ + struct l2cap_conn *conn = hcon->smp_conn; + struct smp_chan *smp; + u32 value; + u8 key[16]; + + BT_DBG(""); + + if (!conn) + return -ENOTCONN; + + smp = conn->smp_chan; + + switch (mgmt_op) { + case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_REPLY: + value = le32_to_cpu(passkey); + memset(key, 0, sizeof(key)); + BT_DBG("PassKey: %d", value); + put_unaligned_le32(value, key); + swap128(key, smp->tk); + /* Fall Through */ + case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_REPLY: + set_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->smp_flags); + break; + case MGMT_OP_USER_PASSKEY_NEG_REPLY: + case MGMT_OP_USER_CONFIRM_NEG_REPLY: + smp_failure(conn, SMP_PASSKEY_ENTRY_FAILED, 1); + return 0; + default: + smp_failure(conn, SMP_PASSKEY_ENTRY_FAILED, 1); + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + /* If it is our turn to send Pairing Confirm, do so now */ + if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING, &smp->smp_flags)) + queue_work(hcon->hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm); + + return 0; +} + static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct smp_cmd_pairing rsp, *req = (void *) skb->data; struct smp_chan *smp; u8 key_size; + u8 auth = SMP_AUTH_NONE; int ret; BT_DBG("conn %p", conn); + if (conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) + return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP; + if (!test_and_set_bit(HCI_CONN_LE_SMP_PEND, &conn->hcon->pend)) smp = smp_chan_create(conn); @@ -420,19 +580,16 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) memcpy(&smp->preq[1], req, sizeof(*req)); skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*req)); - if (req->oob_flag) - return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL; + /* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */ + if (req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) + auth = req->auth_req; - /* We didn't start the pairing, so no requirements */ - build_pairing_cmd(conn, req, &rsp, SMP_AUTH_NONE); + build_pairing_cmd(conn, req, &rsp, auth); key_size = min(req->max_key_size, rsp.max_key_size); if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size)) return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE; - /* Just works */ - memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk)); - ret = smp_rand(smp->prnd); if (ret) return SMP_UNSPECIFIED; @@ -442,6 +599,11 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP, sizeof(rsp), &rsp); + /* Request setup of TK */ + ret = tk_request(conn, 0, auth, rsp.io_capability, req->io_capability); + if (ret) + return SMP_UNSPECIFIED; + return 0; } @@ -450,11 +612,14 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, *rsp = (void *) skb->data; struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan; struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev; - u8 key_size; + u8 key_size, auth = SMP_AUTH_NONE; int ret; BT_DBG("conn %p", conn); + if (!(conn->hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER)) + return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP; + skb_pull(skb, sizeof(*rsp)); req = (void *) &smp->preq[1]; @@ -463,12 +628,6 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size)) return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE; - if (rsp->oob_flag) - return SMP_OOB_NOT_AVAIL; - - /* Just works */ - memset(smp->tk, 0, sizeof(smp->tk)); - ret = smp_rand(smp->prnd); if (ret) return SMP_UNSPECIFIED; @@ -476,6 +635,22 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) smp->prsp[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RSP; memcpy(&smp->prsp[1], rsp, sizeof(*rsp)); + if ((req->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING) && + (rsp->auth_req & SMP_AUTH_BONDING)) + auth = SMP_AUTH_BONDING; + + auth |= (req->auth_req | rsp->auth_req) & SMP_AUTH_MITM; + + ret = tk_request(conn, 0, auth, rsp->io_capability, req->io_capability); + if (ret) + return SMP_UNSPECIFIED; + + set_bit(SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING, &smp->smp_flags); + + /* Can't compose response until we have been confirmed */ + if (!test_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->smp_flags)) + return 0; + queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm); return 0; @@ -497,8 +672,10 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_confirm(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) swap128(smp->prnd, random); smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_RANDOM, sizeof(random), random); - } else { + } else if (test_bit(SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID, &smp->smp_flags)) { queue_work(hdev->workqueue, &smp->confirm); + } else { + set_bit(SMP_FLAG_CFM_PENDING, &smp->smp_flags); } return 0; @@ -551,7 +728,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) BT_DBG("conn %p", conn); - hcon->pending_sec_level = BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM; + hcon->pending_sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req); if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn)) return 0; @@ -578,6 +755,7 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level) { struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon; struct smp_chan *smp = conn->smp_chan; + __u8 authreq; BT_DBG("conn %p hcon %p level 0x%2.2x", conn, hcon, sec_level); @@ -598,18 +776,22 @@ int smp_conn_security(struct l2cap_conn *conn, __u8 sec_level) return 0; smp = smp_chan_create(conn); + if (!smp) + return 1; + + authreq = seclevel_to_authreq(sec_level); if (hcon->link_mode & HCI_LM_MASTER) { struct smp_cmd_pairing cp; - build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, SMP_AUTH_NONE); + build_pairing_cmd(conn, &cp, NULL, authreq); smp->preq[0] = SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ; memcpy(&smp->preq[1], &cp, sizeof(cp)); smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_PAIRING_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp); } else { struct smp_cmd_security_req cp; - cp.auth_req = SMP_AUTH_NONE; + cp.auth_req = authreq; smp_send_cmd(conn, SMP_CMD_SECURITY_REQ, sizeof(cp), &cp); } |