summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/bluetooth
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org>2013-01-29 19:59:56 -0300
committerGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>2013-02-01 15:50:18 -0200
commit405280887f8fb4e168a1bbc865917bb2b881db95 (patch)
treea940fda4a0684f2ee33c99d36aa77237b3b1e6b6 /net/bluetooth
parent3810285cf8cef5c3f9c4334a317b71b876125269 (diff)
downloadop-kernel-dev-405280887f8fb4e168a1bbc865917bb2b881db95.zip
op-kernel-dev-405280887f8fb4e168a1bbc865917bb2b881db95.tar.gz
Bluetooth: Reduce critical section in sco_conn_ready
This patch reduces the critical section protected by sco_conn_lock in sco_conn_ready function. The lock is acquired only when it is really needed. This patch fixes the following lockdep warning which is generated when the host terminates a SCO connection. Today, this warning is a false positive. There is no way those two threads reported by lockdep are running at the same time since hdev->workqueue (where rx_work is queued) is single-thread. However, if somehow this behavior is changed in future, we will have a potential deadlock. ====================================================== [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------- kworker/u:1H/1018 is trying to acquire lock: (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] but task is already holding lock: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa003436e>] sco_connect_cfm+0xbe/0x350 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0015d6c>] hci_event_packet+0xd3c/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 -> #0 (&(&conn->lock)->rlock){+.+...}: [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); lock(slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO); lock(&(&conn->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by kworker/u:1H/1018: #0: (hdev->name#2){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #1: ((&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 #2: (&hdev->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa000fbe9>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x59/0x3c0 [bluetooth] #3: (slock-AF_BLUETOOTH-BTPROTO_SCO){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0033d5a>] sco_conn_del+0x8a/0xe0 [bluetooth] stack backtrace: Pid: 1018, comm: kworker/u:1H Not tainted 3.8.0-rc1+ #7 Call Trace: [<ffffffff813e92f9>] print_circular_bug+0x1fb/0x20c [<ffffffff81082215>] __lock_acquire+0x1465/0x1c70 [<ffffffff81083011>] lock_acquire+0xb1/0xe0 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff813efd01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x80 [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] ? sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033ba6>] sco_chan_del+0x66/0x190 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0033d6d>] sco_conn_del+0x9d/0xe0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0034653>] sco_disconn_cfm+0x53/0x60 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fef3>] hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x363/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa000fbd0>] ? hci_disconn_complete_evt.isra.54+0x40/0x3c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa00150f7>] hci_event_packet+0xc7/0x29b0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81202e90>] ? __dynamic_pr_debug+0x80/0x90 [<ffffffff8133ff7d>] ? kfree_skb+0x2d/0x40 [<ffffffffa0021644>] ? hci_send_to_monitor+0x1a4/0x1c0 [bluetooth] [<ffffffffa0004583>] hci_rx_work+0x133/0x870 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d65f>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104d5f8>] ? process_one_work+0x258/0x4f0 [<ffffffff8104fdc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3e0 [<ffffffffa0004450>] ? hci_tx_work+0x800/0x800 [bluetooth] [<ffffffff81050022>] worker_thread+0x2b2/0x3e0 [<ffffffff8104fd70>] ? busy_worker_rebind_fn+0x100/0x100 [<ffffffff81056021>] kthread+0xd1/0xe0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 [<ffffffff813f14bc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81055f50>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xc0/0xc0 Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@openbossa.org> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth')
-rw-r--r--net/bluetooth/sco.c18
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/sco.c b/net/bluetooth/sco.c
index 57f250c..b5178d6 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/sco.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/sco.c
@@ -900,8 +900,6 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
BT_DBG("conn %p", conn);
- sco_conn_lock(conn);
-
if (sk) {
sco_sock_clear_timer(sk);
bh_lock_sock(sk);
@@ -909,9 +907,13 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
} else {
+ sco_conn_lock(conn);
+
parent = sco_get_sock_listen(conn->src);
- if (!parent)
- goto done;
+ if (!parent) {
+ sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+ return;
+ }
bh_lock_sock(parent);
@@ -919,7 +921,8 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
BTPROTO_SCO, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!sk) {
bh_unlock_sock(parent);
- goto done;
+ sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+ return;
}
sco_sock_init(sk, parent);
@@ -939,10 +942,9 @@ static void sco_conn_ready(struct sco_conn *conn)
parent->sk_data_ready(parent, 1);
bh_unlock_sock(parent);
- }
-done:
- sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+ sco_conn_unlock(conn);
+ }
}
/* ----- SCO interface with lower layer (HCI) ----- */
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud