diff options
author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2011-07-08 14:14:35 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2011-07-20 01:44:29 -0400 |
commit | acf92b485cccf028177f46918e045c0c4e80ee10 (patch) | |
tree | 7da97439b5388d143cf414874572f1b2da7f3fe3 /mm | |
parent | 095760730c1047c69159ce88021a7fa3833502c8 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-acf92b485cccf028177f46918e045c0c4e80ee10.zip op-kernel-dev-acf92b485cccf028177f46918e045c0c4e80ee10.tar.gz |
vmscan: shrinker->nr updates race and go wrong
shrink_slab() allows shrinkers to be called in parallel so the
struct shrinker can be updated concurrently. It does not provide any
exclusio for such updates, so we can get the shrinker->nr value
increasing or decreasing incorrectly.
As a result, when a shrinker repeatedly returns a value of -1 (e.g.
a VFS shrinker called w/ GFP_NOFS), the shrinker->nr goes haywire,
sometimes updating with the scan count that wasn't used, sometimes
losing it altogether. Worse is when a shrinker does work and that
update is lost due to racy updates, which means the shrinker will do
the work again!
Fix this by making the total_scan calculations independent of
shrinker->nr, and making the shrinker->nr updates atomic w.r.t. to
other updates via cmpxchg loops.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 2552265..2f7c6ae 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -251,17 +251,29 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink, unsigned long total_scan; unsigned long max_pass; int shrink_ret = 0; + long nr; + long new_nr; + /* + * copy the current shrinker scan count into a local variable + * and zero it so that other concurrent shrinker invocations + * don't also do this scanning work. + */ + do { + nr = shrinker->nr; + } while (cmpxchg(&shrinker->nr, nr, 0) != nr); + + total_scan = nr; max_pass = do_shrinker_shrink(shrinker, shrink, 0); delta = (4 * nr_pages_scanned) / shrinker->seeks; delta *= max_pass; do_div(delta, lru_pages + 1); - shrinker->nr += delta; - if (shrinker->nr < 0) { + total_scan += delta; + if (total_scan < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "shrink_slab: %pF negative objects to " "delete nr=%ld\n", - shrinker->shrink, shrinker->nr); - shrinker->nr = max_pass; + shrinker->shrink, total_scan); + total_scan = max_pass; } /* @@ -269,13 +281,10 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink, * never try to free more than twice the estimate number of * freeable entries. */ - if (shrinker->nr > max_pass * 2) - shrinker->nr = max_pass * 2; - - total_scan = shrinker->nr; - shrinker->nr = 0; + if (total_scan > max_pass * 2) + total_scan = max_pass * 2; - trace_mm_shrink_slab_start(shrinker, shrink, total_scan, + trace_mm_shrink_slab_start(shrinker, shrink, nr, nr_pages_scanned, lru_pages, max_pass, delta, total_scan); @@ -296,9 +305,19 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrink, cond_resched(); } - shrinker->nr += total_scan; - trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrink_ret, total_scan, - shrinker->nr); + /* + * move the unused scan count back into the shrinker in a + * manner that handles concurrent updates. If we exhausted the + * scan, there is no need to do an update. + */ + do { + nr = shrinker->nr; + new_nr = total_scan + nr; + if (total_scan <= 0) + break; + } while (cmpxchg(&shrinker->nr, nr, new_nr) != nr); + + trace_mm_shrink_slab_end(shrinker, shrink_ret, nr, new_nr); } up_read(&shrinker_rwsem); out: |