diff options
author | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> | 2009-01-07 18:08:01 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-01-08 08:31:05 -0800 |
commit | 08e552c69c6930d64722de3ec18c51844d06ee28 (patch) | |
tree | a744d57ed4b23401115f1033dcaac9e85d550e09 /mm/vmscan.c | |
parent | 8c7c6e34a1256a5082d38c8e9bd1474476912715 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-08e552c69c6930d64722de3ec18c51844d06ee28.zip op-kernel-dev-08e552c69c6930d64722de3ec18c51844d06ee28.tar.gz |
memcg: synchronized LRU
A big patch for changing memcg's LRU semantics.
Now,
- page_cgroup is linked to mem_cgroup's its own LRU (per zone).
- LRU of page_cgroup is not synchronous with global LRU.
- page and page_cgroup is one-to-one and statically allocated.
- To find page_cgroup is on what LRU, you have to check pc->mem_cgroup as
- lru = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc, nid_of_pc, zid_of_pc);
- SwapCache is handled.
And, when we handle LRU list of page_cgroup, we do following.
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
lock_page_cgroup(pc); .....................(1)
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
spin_lock(&mz->lru_lock);
.....add to LRU
spin_unlock(&mz->lru_lock);
unlock_page_cgroup(pc);
But (1) is spin_lock and we have to be afraid of dead-lock with zone->lru_lock.
So, trylock() is used at (1), now. Without (1), we can't trust "mz" is correct.
This is a trial to remove this dirty nesting of locks.
This patch changes mz->lru_lock to be zone->lru_lock.
Then, above sequence will be written as
spin_lock(&zone->lru_lock); # in vmscan.c or swap.c via global LRU
mem_cgroup_add/remove/etc_lru() {
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
mz = page_cgroup_zoneinfo(pc);
if (PageCgroupUsed(pc)) {
....add to LRU
}
spin_lock(&zone->lru_lock); # in vmscan.c or swap.c via global LRU
This is much simpler.
(*) We're safe even if we don't take lock_page_cgroup(pc). Because..
1. When pc->mem_cgroup can be modified.
- at charge.
- at account_move().
2. at charge
the PCG_USED bit is not set before pc->mem_cgroup is fixed.
3. at account_move()
the page is isolated and not on LRU.
Pros.
- easy for maintenance.
- memcg can make use of laziness of pagevec.
- we don't have to duplicated LRU/Active/Unevictable bit in page_cgroup.
- LRU status of memcg will be synchronized with global LRU's one.
- # of locks are reduced.
- account_move() is simplified very much.
Cons.
- may increase cost of LRU rotation.
(no impact if memcg is not configured.)
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/vmscan.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index f63b20d..45983af 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ redo: lru = LRU_UNEVICTABLE; add_page_to_unevictable_list(page); } - mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); /* * page's status can change while we move it among lru. If an evictable @@ -547,7 +546,6 @@ void putback_lru_page(struct page *page) lru = !!TestClearPageActive(page) + page_is_file_cache(page); lru_cache_add_lru(page, lru); - mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); put_page(page); } #endif /* CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU */ @@ -813,6 +811,7 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file) return ret; ret = -EBUSY; + if (likely(get_page_unless_zero(page))) { /* * Be careful not to clear PageLRU until after we're @@ -821,6 +820,7 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, int mode, int file) */ ClearPageLRU(page); ret = 0; + mem_cgroup_del_lru(page); } return ret; @@ -1134,7 +1134,6 @@ static unsigned long shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long max_scan, SetPageLRU(page); lru = page_lru(page); add_page_to_lru_list(zone, page, lru); - mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); if (PageActive(page) && scan_global_lru(sc)) { int file = !!page_is_file_cache(page); zone->recent_rotated[file]++; @@ -1263,7 +1262,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone, ClearPageActive(page); list_move(&page->lru, &zone->lru[lru].list); - mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, lru); + mem_cgroup_add_lru_list(page, lru); pgmoved++; if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) { __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_LRU_BASE + lru, pgmoved); @@ -2408,6 +2407,7 @@ retry: __dec_zone_state(zone, NR_UNEVICTABLE); list_move(&page->lru, &zone->lru[l].list); + mem_cgroup_move_lists(page, LRU_UNEVICTABLE, l); __inc_zone_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON + l); __count_vm_event(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED); } else { @@ -2416,6 +2416,7 @@ retry: */ SetPageUnevictable(page); list_move(&page->lru, &zone->lru[LRU_UNEVICTABLE].list); + mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(page, LRU_UNEVICTABLE); if (page_evictable(page, NULL)) goto retry; } |