mm: warn about VmData over RLIMIT_DATA

This patch provides a way of working around a slight regression
introduced by commit 84638335900f ("mm: rework virtual memory
accounting").

Before that commit RLIMIT_DATA have control only over size of the brk
region.  But that change have caused problems with all existing versions
of valgrind, because it set RLIMIT_DATA to zero.

This patch fixes rlimit check (limit actually in bytes, not pages) and
by default turns it into warning which prints at first VmData misuse:

  "mmap: top (795): VmData 516096 exceed data ulimit 512000.  Will be forbidden soon."

Behavior is controlled by boot param ignore_rlimit_data=y/n and by sysfs
/sys/module/kernel/parameters/ignore_rlimit_data.  For now it set to "y".

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak kernel-parameters.txt text[
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151228211015.GL2194@uranus
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@oracle.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 84b1262..cfc0cdc 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 #include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -69,6 +70,8 @@ const int mmap_rnd_compat_bits_max = CONFIG_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS_MAX;
 int mmap_rnd_compat_bits __read_mostly = CONFIG_ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS;
 #endif
 
+static bool ignore_rlimit_data = true;
+core_param(ignore_rlimit_data, ignore_rlimit_data, bool, 0644);
 
 static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *prev,
@@ -2982,9 +2985,17 @@ bool may_expand_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, vm_flags_t flags, unsigned long npages)
 	if (mm->total_vm + npages > rlimit(RLIMIT_AS) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
 		return false;
 
-	if ((flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_SHARED | (VM_STACK_FLAGS &
-				(VM_GROWSUP | VM_GROWSDOWN)))) == VM_WRITE)
-		return mm->data_vm + npages <= rlimit(RLIMIT_DATA);
+	if (is_data_mapping(flags) &&
+	    mm->data_vm + npages > rlimit(RLIMIT_DATA) >> PAGE_SHIFT) {
+		if (ignore_rlimit_data)
+			pr_warn_once("%s (%d): VmData %lu exceed data ulimit "
+				     "%lu. Will be forbidden soon.\n",
+				     current->comm, current->pid,
+				     (mm->data_vm + npages) << PAGE_SHIFT,
+				     rlimit(RLIMIT_DATA));
+		else
+			return false;
+	}
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -2993,11 +3004,11 @@ void vm_stat_account(struct mm_struct *mm, vm_flags_t flags, long npages)
 {
 	mm->total_vm += npages;
 
-	if ((flags & (VM_EXEC | VM_WRITE)) == VM_EXEC)
+	if (is_exec_mapping(flags))
 		mm->exec_vm += npages;
-	else if (flags & (VM_STACK_FLAGS & (VM_GROWSUP | VM_GROWSDOWN)))
+	else if (is_stack_mapping(flags))
 		mm->stack_vm += npages;
-	else if ((flags & (VM_WRITE | VM_SHARED)) == VM_WRITE)
+	else if (is_data_mapping(flags))
 		mm->data_vm += npages;
 }