mm: thp: calculate the mapcount correctly for THP pages during WP faults

This will provide fully accuracy to the mapcount calculation in the
write protect faults, so page pinning will not get broken by false
positive copy-on-writes.

total_mapcount() isn't the right calculation needed in
reuse_swap_page(), so this introduces a page_trans_huge_mapcount()
that is effectively the full accurate return value for page_mapcount()
if dealing with Transparent Hugepages, however we only use the
page_trans_huge_mapcount() during COW faults where it strictly needed,
due to its higher runtime cost.

This also provide at practical zero cost the total_mapcount
information which is needed to know if we can still relocate the page
anon_vma to the local vma. If page_trans_huge_mapcount() returns 1 we
can reuse the page no matter if it's a pte or a pmd_trans_huge
triggering the fault, but we can only relocate the page anon_vma to
the local vma->anon_vma if we're sure it's only this "vma" mapping the
whole THP physical range.

Kirill A. Shutemov discovered the problem with moving the page
anon_vma to the local vma->anon_vma in a previous version of this
patch and another problem in the way page_move_anon_rmap() was called.

Andrew Morton discovered that CONFIG_SWAP=n wouldn't build in a
previous version, because reuse_swap_page must be a macro to call
page_trans_huge_mapcount from swap.h, so this uses a macro again
instead of an inline function. With this change at least it's a less
dangerous usage than it was before, because "page" is used only once
now, while with the previous code reuse_swap_page(page++) would have
called page_mapcount on page+1 and it would have increased page twice
instead of just once.

Dean Luick noticed an uninitialized variable that could result in a
rmap inefficiency for the non-THP case in a previous version.

Mike Marciniszyn said:

: Our RDMA tests are seeing an issue with memory locking that bisects to
: commit 61f5d698cc97 ("mm: re-enable THP")
:
: The test program registers two rather large MRs (512M) and RDMA
: writes data to a passive peer using the first and RDMA reads it back
: into the second MR and compares that data.  The sizes are chosen randomly
: between 0 and 1024 bytes.
:
: The test will get through a few (<= 4 iterations) and then gets a
: compare error.
:
: Tracing indicates the kernel logical addresses associated with the individual
: pages at registration ARE correct , the data in the "RDMA read response only"
: packets ARE correct.
:
: The "corruption" occurs when the packet crosse two pages that are not physically
: contiguous.   The second page reads back as zero in the program.
:
: It looks like the user VA at the point of the compare error no longer points to
: the same physical address as was registered.
:
: This patch totally resolves the issue!

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462547040-1737-2-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Reviewed-by: Dean Luick <dean.luick@intel.com>
Tested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Tested-by: Josh Collier <josh.d.collier@intel.com>
Cc: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[4.5]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 52c218e..07493e3 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2373,6 +2373,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	 * not dirty accountable.
 	 */
 	if (PageAnon(old_page) && !PageKsm(old_page)) {
+		int total_mapcount;
 		if (!trylock_page(old_page)) {
 			get_page(old_page);
 			pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
@@ -2387,13 +2388,18 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 			}
 			put_page(old_page);
 		}
-		if (reuse_swap_page(old_page)) {
-			/*
-			 * The page is all ours.  Move it to our anon_vma so
-			 * the rmap code will not search our parent or siblings.
-			 * Protected against the rmap code by the page lock.
-			 */
-			page_move_anon_rmap(old_page, vma, address);
+		if (reuse_swap_page(old_page, &total_mapcount)) {
+			if (total_mapcount == 1) {
+				/*
+				 * The page is all ours. Move it to
+				 * our anon_vma so the rmap code will
+				 * not search our parent or siblings.
+				 * Protected against the rmap code by
+				 * the page lock.
+				 */
+				page_move_anon_rmap(compound_head(old_page),
+						    vma, address);
+			}
 			unlock_page(old_page);
 			return wp_page_reuse(mm, vma, address, page_table, ptl,
 					     orig_pte, old_page, 0, 0);
@@ -2617,7 +2623,7 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
 	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
-	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
+	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page, NULL)) {
 		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
 		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;