mm: move all mmu notifier invocations to be done outside the PT lock

In order to allow sleeping during mmu notifier calls, we need to avoid
invoking them under the page table spinlock.  This patch solves the
problem by calling invalidate_page notification after releasing the lock
(but before freeing the page itself), or by wrapping the page invalidation
with calls to invalidate_range_begin and invalidate_range_end.

To prevent accidental changes to the invalidate_range_end arguments after
the call to invalidate_range_begin, the patch introduces a convention of
saving the arguments in consistently named locals:

	unsigned long mmun_start;	/* For mmu_notifiers */
	unsigned long mmun_end;	/* For mmu_notifiers */

	...

	mmun_start = ...
	mmun_end = ...
	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);

	...

	mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);

The patch changes code to use this convention for all calls to
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start/end, except those where the calls are
close enough so that anyone who glances at the code can see the values
aren't changing.

This patchset is a preliminary step towards on-demand paging design to be
added to the RDMA stack.

Why do we want on-demand paging for Infiniband?

  Applications register memory with an RDMA adapter using system calls,
  and subsequently post IO operations that refer to the corresponding
  virtual addresses directly to HW.  Until now, this was achieved by
  pinning the memory during the registration calls.  The goal of on demand
  paging is to avoid pinning the pages of registered memory regions (MRs).
   This will allow users the same flexibility they get when swapping any
  other part of their processes address spaces.  Instead of requiring the
  entire MR to fit in physical memory, we can allow the MR to be larger,
  and only fit the current working set in physical memory.

Why should anyone care?  What problems are users currently experiencing?

  This can make programming with RDMA much simpler.  Today, developers
  that are working with more data than their RAM can hold need either to
  deregister and reregister memory regions throughout their process's
  life, or keep a single memory region and copy the data to it.  On demand
  paging will allow these developers to register a single MR at the
  beginning of their process's life, and let the operating system manage
  which pages needs to be fetched at a given time.  In the future, we
  might be able to provide a single memory access key for each process
  that would provide the entire process's address as one large memory
  region, and the developers wouldn't need to register memory regions at
  all.

Is there any prospect that any other subsystems will utilise these
infrastructural changes?  If so, which and how, etc?

  As for other subsystems, I understand that XPMEM wanted to sleep in
  MMU notifiers, as Christoph Lameter wrote at
  http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0802.1/0460.html and
  perhaps Andrea knows about other use cases.

  Scheduling in mmu notifications is required since we need to sync the
  hardware with the secondary page tables change.  A TLB flush of an IO
  device is inherently slower than a CPU TLB flush, so our design works by
  sending the invalidation request to the device, and waiting for an
  interrupt before exiting the mmu notifier handler.

Avi said:

  kvm may be a buyer.  kvm::mmu_lock, which serializes guest page
  faults, also protects long operations such as destroying large ranges.
  It would be good to convert it into a spinlock, but as it is used inside
  mmu notifiers, this cannot be done.

  (there are alternatives, such as keeping the spinlock and using a
  generation counter to do the teardown in O(1), which is what the "may"
  is doing up there).

[akpm@linux-foundation.orgpossible speed tweak in hugetlb_cow(), cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Cc: Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com>
Cc: Shachar Raindel <raindel@mellanox.com>
Cc: Liran Liss <liranl@mellanox.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 5f5d1f0..b03a4a2 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ static void print_bad_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
 	add_taint(TAINT_BAD_PAGE);
 }
 
-static inline int is_cow_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
+static inline bool is_cow_mapping(vm_flags_t flags)
 {
 	return (flags & (VM_SHARED | VM_MAYWRITE)) == VM_MAYWRITE;
 }
@@ -1039,6 +1039,9 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 	unsigned long next;
 	unsigned long addr = vma->vm_start;
 	unsigned long end = vma->vm_end;
+	unsigned long mmun_start;	/* For mmu_notifiers */
+	unsigned long mmun_end;		/* For mmu_notifiers */
+	bool is_cow;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -1072,8 +1075,12 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 	 * parent mm. And a permission downgrade will only happen if
 	 * is_cow_mapping() returns true.
 	 */
-	if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
-		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(src_mm, addr, end);
+	is_cow = is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags);
+	mmun_start = addr;
+	mmun_end   = end;
+	if (is_cow)
+		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(src_mm, mmun_start,
+						    mmun_end);
 
 	ret = 0;
 	dst_pgd = pgd_offset(dst_mm, addr);
@@ -1089,9 +1096,8 @@ int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 		}
 	} while (dst_pgd++, src_pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
 
-	if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags))
-		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(src_mm,
-						  vma->vm_start, end);
+	if (is_cow)
+		mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(src_mm, mmun_start, mmun_end);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -2516,7 +2522,7 @@ static int do_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		spinlock_t *ptl, pte_t orig_pte)
 	__releases(ptl)
 {
-	struct page *old_page, *new_page;
+	struct page *old_page, *new_page = NULL;
 	pte_t entry;
 	int ret = 0;
 	int page_mkwrite = 0;
@@ -2760,10 +2766,14 @@ gotten:
 	} else
 		mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(new_page);
 
-	if (new_page)
-		page_cache_release(new_page);
 unlock:
 	pte_unmap_unlock(page_table, ptl);
+	if (new_page) {
+		if (new_page == old_page)
+			/* cow happened, notify before releasing old_page */
+			mmu_notifier_invalidate_page(mm, address);
+		page_cache_release(new_page);
+	}
 	if (old_page) {
 		/*
 		 * Don't let another task, with possibly unlocked vma,