list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists

There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that
keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure.  Hence to turn them
to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg.

This patch does the trick.  It adds an array of lru lists to the
list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each
kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the
list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to.  So now
the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg.

Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new
method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg
aware.  Otherwise (i.e.  if initialized with old list_lru_init), the
list_lru won't have per memcg lists.

Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are
indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever
memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased.  So we introduce a callback,
memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id
space is full.

The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e.  we have
one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on
the node.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 6706e5f..afa55bb 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2572,6 +2572,8 @@ static int memcg_alloc_cache_id(void)
 
 	err = memcg_update_all_caches(size);
 	if (!err)
+		err = memcg_update_all_list_lrus(size);
+	if (!err)
 		memcg_nr_cache_ids = size;
 
 	up_write(&memcg_cache_ids_sem);
@@ -2765,6 +2767,24 @@ void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_pages(struct page *page, int order)
 	memcg_uncharge_kmem(memcg, 1 << order);
 	page->mem_cgroup = NULL;
 }
+
+struct mem_cgroup *__mem_cgroup_from_kmem(void *ptr)
+{
+	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
+	struct kmem_cache *cachep;
+	struct page *page;
+
+	page = virt_to_head_page(ptr);
+	if (PageSlab(page)) {
+		cachep = page->slab_cache;
+		if (!is_root_cache(cachep))
+			memcg = cachep->memcg_params->memcg;
+	} else
+		/* page allocated by alloc_kmem_pages */
+		memcg = page->mem_cgroup;
+
+	return memcg;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE