Merge branch 'master' into x86/memblock

Conflicts & resolutions:

* arch/x86/xen/setup.c

	dc91c728fd "xen: allow extra memory to be in multiple regions"
	24aa07882b "memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free..."

	conflicted on xen_add_extra_mem() updates.  The resolution is
	trivial as the latter just want to replace
	memblock_x86_reserve_range() with memblock_reserve().

* drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c

	166e9278a3f "x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/"
	5dfe8660a3d "bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with..."

	conflicted as the former moved the file under drivers/iommu/.
	Resolved by applying the chnages from the latter on the moved
	file.

* mm/Kconfig

	6661672053a "memblock: add NO_BOOTMEM config symbol"
	c378ddd53f9 "memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option"

	conflicted trivially.  Both added config options.  Just
	letting both add their own options resolves the conflict.

* mm/memblock.c

	d1f0ece6cdc "mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixes"
	ed7b56a799c "memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()"

	confliected.  The former updates function removed by the
	latter.  Resolution is trivial.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index a75723d..a57092f 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ static unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_addrs_overlap(phys_addr_t base1, p
 	return ((base1 < (base2 + size2)) && (base2 < (base1 + size1)));
 }
 
-long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type, phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
+static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
+					phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
 {
 	unsigned long i;
 
@@ -773,6 +774,12 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_phys_mem_size(void)
 	return memblock.memory_size;
 }
 
+/* lowest address */
+phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_start_of_DRAM(void)
+{
+	return memblock.memory.regions[0].base;
+}
+
 phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_end_of_DRAM(void)
 {
 	int idx = memblock.memory.cnt - 1;
@@ -912,9 +919,9 @@ void __init memblock_analyze(void)
 
 	/* Check marker in the unused last array entry */
 	WARN_ON(memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base
-		!= (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE);
+		!= MEMBLOCK_INACTIVE);
 	WARN_ON(memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base
-		!= (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE);
+		!= MEMBLOCK_INACTIVE);
 
 	memblock.memory_size = 0;
 
@@ -940,8 +947,8 @@ void __init memblock_init(void)
 	memblock.reserved.max	= INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS;
 
 	/* Write a marker in the unused last array entry */
-	memblock.memory.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE;
-	memblock.reserved.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE;
+	memblock.memory.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = MEMBLOCK_INACTIVE;
+	memblock.reserved.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = MEMBLOCK_INACTIVE;
 
 	/* Create a dummy zero size MEMBLOCK which will get coalesced away later.
 	 * This simplifies the memblock_add() code below...