diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> | 2014-09-04 22:17:17 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2014-09-09 10:26:47 -0700 |
commit | 02ab695bb37ee9ad515df0d0790d5977505dd04a (patch) | |
tree | 44437406e50c9bd1fd0c3fa260ca3578d59a662a /lib/test_bpf.c | |
parent | 5b4c314575ea6edd57c547c2123083d88d8ff4e6 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-02ab695bb37ee9ad515df0d0790d5977505dd04a.zip op-kernel-dev-02ab695bb37ee9ad515df0d0790d5977505dd04a.tar.gz |
net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction
add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction:
insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
insn[0].dst_reg = destination register
insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
insn[1].code = 0
insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
All unused fields must be zero.
Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.
x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn
Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.
It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one
instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions:
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32)
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2)
User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only.
To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of
this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding
to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide.
For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose.
src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and
load in-kernel map pointer.
src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer
src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data
All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer
as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel
to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then
will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside
the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never
see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that
loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct
pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other
instructions.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/test_bpf.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_bpf.c | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 9a67456..4138908 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -1735,6 +1735,27 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { { }, { { 1, 0 } }, }, + { + "load 64-bit immediate", + .u.insns_int = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(R1, 0x567800001234L), + BPF_MOV64_REG(R2, R1), + BPF_MOV64_REG(R3, R2), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R2, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R3, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, R3, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R2, 0x5678, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R3, 0x1234, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + INTERNAL, + { }, + { { 0, 1 } } + }, }; static struct net_device dev; |