rbtree: add postorder iteration functions

Postorder iteration yields all of a node's children prior to yielding the
node itself, and this particular implementation also avoids examining the
leaf links in a node after that node has been yielded.

In what I expect will be its most common usage, postorder iteration allows
the deletion of every node in an rbtree without modifying the rbtree nodes
(no _requirement_ that they be nulled) while avoiding referencing child
nodes after they have been "deleted" (most commonly, freed).

I have only updated zswap to use this functionality at this point, but
numerous bits of code (most notably in the filesystem drivers) use a hand
rolled postorder iteration that NULLs child links as it traverses the
tree.  Each of those instances could be replaced with this common
implementation.

1 & 2 add rbtree postorder iteration functions.
3 adds testing of the iteration to the rbtree runtime tests
4 allows building the rbtree runtime tests as builtins
5 updates zswap.

This patch:

Add postorder iteration functions for rbtree.  These are useful for safely
freeing an entire rbtree without modifying the tree at all.

Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rbtree.c b/lib/rbtree.c
index c0e31fe..65f4eff 100644
--- a/lib/rbtree.c
+++ b/lib/rbtree.c
@@ -518,3 +518,43 @@ void rb_replace_node(struct rb_node *victim, struct rb_node *new,
 	*new = *victim;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_replace_node);
+
+static struct rb_node *rb_left_deepest_node(const struct rb_node *node)
+{
+	for (;;) {
+		if (node->rb_left)
+			node = node->rb_left;
+		else if (node->rb_right)
+			node = node->rb_right;
+		else
+			return (struct rb_node *)node;
+	}
+}
+
+struct rb_node *rb_next_postorder(const struct rb_node *node)
+{
+	const struct rb_node *parent;
+	if (!node)
+		return NULL;
+	parent = rb_parent(node);
+
+	/* If we're sitting on node, we've already seen our children */
+	if (parent && node == parent->rb_left && parent->rb_right) {
+		/* If we are the parent's left node, go to the parent's right
+		 * node then all the way down to the left */
+		return rb_left_deepest_node(parent->rb_right);
+	} else
+		/* Otherwise we are the parent's right node, and the parent
+		 * should be next */
+		return (struct rb_node *)parent;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_next_postorder);
+
+struct rb_node *rb_first_postorder(const struct rb_root *root)
+{
+	if (!root->rb_node)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return rb_left_deepest_node(root->rb_node);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rb_first_postorder);