diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-03-24 20:50:48 +1100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> | 2008-04-15 21:22:17 +1000 |
commit | c50f68c8aea421267ba7995b1c485c281b28add6 (patch) | |
tree | 38d72f3d6c9e43a4653cc7e330af0aa0dfca3dd5 /lib/lmb.c | |
parent | 4b1d99b37f608b8cc03550033b16212ca9362efd (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-c50f68c8aea421267ba7995b1c485c281b28add6.zip op-kernel-dev-c50f68c8aea421267ba7995b1c485c281b28add6.tar.gz |
[LMB] Add lmb_alloc_nid()
A variant of lmb_alloc() that tries to allocate memory on a specified
NUMA node 'nid' but falls back to normal lmb_alloc() if that fails.
The caller provides a 'nid_range' function pointer which assists the
allocator. It is given args 'start', 'end', and pointer to integer
'this_nid'.
It places at 'this_nid' the NUMA node id that corresponds to 'start',
and returns the end address within 'start' to 'end' at which memory
assosciated with 'nid' ends.
This callback allows a platform to use lmb_alloc_nid() in just
about any context, even ones in which early_pfn_to_nid() might
not be working yet.
This function will be used by the NUMA setup code on sparc64, and also
it can be used by powerpc, replacing it's hand crafted
"careful_allocation()" function in arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
If x86 ever converts it's NUMA support over to using the LMB helpers,
it can use this too as it has something entirely similar.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/lmb.c')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/lmb.c | 86 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 10 deletions
@@ -232,6 +232,82 @@ long __init lmb_overlaps_region(struct lmb_region *rgn, u64 base, return (i < rgn->cnt) ? i : -1; } +static u64 lmb_align_down(u64 addr, u64 size) +{ + return addr & ~(size - 1); +} + +static u64 lmb_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size) +{ + return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1); +} + +static u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved(u64 start, u64 end, + u64 size, u64 align) +{ + u64 base; + long j; + + base = lmb_align_down((end - size), align); + while (start <= base && + ((j = lmb_overlaps_region(&lmb.reserved, base, size)) >= 0)) + base = lmb_align_down(lmb.reserved.region[j].base - size, + align); + + if (base != 0 && start <= base) { + if (lmb_add_region(&lmb.reserved, base, + lmb_align_up(size, align)) < 0) + base = ~(u64)0; + return base; + } + + return ~(u64)0; +} + +static u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid_region(struct lmb_property *mp, + u64 (*nid_range)(u64, u64, int *), + u64 size, u64 align, int nid) +{ + u64 start, end; + + start = mp->base; + end = start + mp->size; + + start = lmb_align_up(start, align); + while (start < end) { + u64 this_end; + int this_nid; + + this_end = nid_range(start, end, &this_nid); + if (this_nid == nid) { + u64 ret = lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved(start, this_end, + size, align); + if (ret != ~(u64)0) + return ret; + } + start = this_end; + } + + return ~(u64)0; +} + +u64 __init lmb_alloc_nid(u64 size, u64 align, int nid, + u64 (*nid_range)(u64 start, u64 end, int *nid)) +{ + struct lmb_region *mem = &lmb.memory; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < mem->cnt; i++) { + u64 ret = lmb_alloc_nid_region(&mem->region[i], + nid_range, + size, align, nid); + if (ret != ~(u64)0) + return ret; + } + + return lmb_alloc(size, align); +} + u64 __init lmb_alloc(u64 size, u64 align) { return lmb_alloc_base(size, align, LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE); @@ -250,16 +326,6 @@ u64 __init lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr) return alloc; } -static u64 lmb_align_down(u64 addr, u64 size) -{ - return addr & ~(size - 1); -} - -static u64 lmb_align_up(u64 addr, u64 size) -{ - return (addr + (size - 1)) & ~(size - 1); -} - u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 align, u64 max_addr) { long i, j; |