diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-07-19 06:27:55 -1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-07-19 06:27:55 -1000 |
commit | d057190925d994b808e1d07e6c76b90a32caac77 (patch) | |
tree | 1f2d104f879435881d77f0d8d1e48c3224264d53 /kernel | |
parent | d1743b810d7a306d1dd837e086d18124bc38b575 (diff) | |
parent | 9de8033f1bbcce5ed23fe5da9ca1a5060207f7ed (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-d057190925d994b808e1d07e6c76b90a32caac77.zip op-kernel-dev-d057190925d994b808e1d07e6c76b90a32caac77.tar.gz |
Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Thomas Gleixner:
"The locking department delivers:
- A rather large and intrusive bundle of fixes to address serious
performance regressions introduced by the new rwsem / mcs
technology. Simpler solutions have been discussed, but they would
have been ugly bandaids with more risk than doing the right thing.
- Make the rwsem spin on owner technology opt-in for architectures
and enable it only on the known to work ones.
- A few fixes to the lockdep userspace library"
* 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
locking/rwsem: Add CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER
locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures
locking/rwsem: Reduce the size of struct rw_semaphore
locking/rwsem: Rename 'activity' to 'count'
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Micro-optimize osq_unlock()
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Introduce and use init macro and function for osq locks
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Convert osq lock to atomic_t to reduce overhead
locking/spinlocks/mcs: Rename optimistic_spin_queue() to optimistic_spin_node()
locking/rwsem: Allow conservative optimistic spinning when readers have lock
tools/liblockdep: Account for bitfield changes in lockdeps lock_acquire
tools/liblockdep: Remove debug print left over from development
tools/liblockdep: Fix comparison of a boolean value with a value of 2
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/Kconfig.locks | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c | 64 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/mutex.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c | 28 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rwsem.c | 2 |
7 files changed, 85 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks index 35536d9..76768ee 100644 --- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks +++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks @@ -220,9 +220,16 @@ config INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQRESTORE endif +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW + bool + config MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER def_bool y - depends on SMP && !DEBUG_MUTEXES + depends on SMP && !DEBUG_MUTEXES && ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW + +config RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER + def_bool y + depends on SMP && RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM && ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW config ARCH_USE_QUEUE_RWLOCK bool diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c index 838dc9e..be9ee15 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c @@ -14,21 +14,47 @@ * called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while * spinning. */ -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node); +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_node, osq_node); + +/* + * We use the value 0 to represent "no CPU", thus the encoded value + * will be the CPU number incremented by 1. + */ +static inline int encode_cpu(int cpu_nr) +{ + return cpu_nr + 1; +} + +static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *decode_cpu(int encoded_cpu_val) +{ + int cpu_nr = encoded_cpu_val - 1; + + return per_cpu_ptr(&osq_node, cpu_nr); +} /* * Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes. * Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead. */ -static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue * -osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock, - struct optimistic_spin_queue *node, - struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev) +static inline struct optimistic_spin_node * +osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock, + struct optimistic_spin_node *node, + struct optimistic_spin_node *prev) { - struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL; + struct optimistic_spin_node *next = NULL; + int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id()); + int old; + + /* + * If there is a prev node in queue, then the 'old' value will be + * the prev node's CPU #, else it's set to OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL since if + * we're currently last in queue, then the queue will then become empty. + */ + old = prev ? prev->cpu : OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL; for (;;) { - if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) { + if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr && + atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) { /* * We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev * will now observe @lock and will complete its @@ -59,18 +85,23 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock, return next; } -bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock) +bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) { - struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); - struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next; + struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); + struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next; + int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id()); + int old; node->locked = 0; node->next = NULL; + node->cpu = curr; - node->prev = prev = xchg(lock, node); - if (likely(prev == NULL)) + old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr); + if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) return true; + prev = decode_cpu(old); + node->prev = prev; ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node; /* @@ -149,20 +180,21 @@ unqueue: return false; } -void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock) +void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock) { - struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); - struct optimistic_spin_queue *next; + struct optimistic_spin_node *node, *next; + int curr = encode_cpu(smp_processor_id()); /* * Fast path for the uncontended case. */ - if (likely(cmpxchg(lock, node, NULL) == node)) + if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr)) return; /* * Second most likely case. */ + node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node); next = xchg(&node->next, NULL); if (next) { ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1; diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h index a2dbac4..74356dc 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h +++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h @@ -118,12 +118,13 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node) * mutex_lock()/rwsem_down_{read,write}() etc. */ -struct optimistic_spin_queue { - struct optimistic_spin_queue *next, *prev; +struct optimistic_spin_node { + struct optimistic_spin_node *next, *prev; int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */ + int cpu; /* encoded CPU # value */ }; -extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock); -extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock); +extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock); +extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock); #endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */ diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index bc73d33..acca2c1 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ __mutex_init(struct mutex *lock, const char *name, struct lock_class_key *key) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lock->wait_list); mutex_clear_owner(lock); #ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER - lock->osq = NULL; + osq_lock_init(&lock->osq); #endif debug_mutex_init(lock, name, key); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c index 9be8a91..2c93571 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-spinlock.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem) unsigned long flags; if (raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) { - ret = (sem->activity != 0); + ret = (sem->count != 0); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); } return ret; @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name, debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem)); lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0); #endif - sem->activity = 0; + sem->count = 0; raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list); } @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite) waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list); } while (waiter->type != RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE); - sem->activity += woken; + sem->count += woken; out: return sem; @@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { + if (sem->count >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { /* granted */ - sem->activity++; + sem->count++; raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); goto out; } @@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { + if (sem->count >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { /* granted */ - sem->activity++; + sem->count++; ret = 1; } @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ void __sched __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) * itself into sleep and waiting for system woke it or someone * else in the head of the wait list up. */ - if (sem->activity == 0) + if (sem->count == 0) break; set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ void __sched __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); } /* got the lock */ - sem->activity = -1; + sem->count = -1; list_del(&waiter.list); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); @@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - if (sem->activity == 0) { + if (sem->count == 0) { /* got the lock */ - sem->activity = -1; + sem->count = -1; ret = 1; } @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - if (--sem->activity == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) + if (--sem->count == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) sem = __rwsem_wake_one_writer(sem); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags); @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - sem->activity = 0; + sem->count = 0; if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1); @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags); - sem->activity = 1; + sem->count = 1; if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0); diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c index dacc321..a2391ac 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c @@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name, sem->count = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE; raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list); -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER sem->owner = NULL; - sem->osq = NULL; + osq_lock_init(&sem->osq); #endif } @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem) return false; } -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER /* * Try to acquire write lock before the writer has been put on wait queue. */ @@ -285,10 +285,10 @@ static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock_unqueued(struct rw_semaphore *sem) static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { struct task_struct *owner; - bool on_cpu = true; + bool on_cpu = false; if (need_resched()) - return 0; + return false; rcu_read_lock(); owner = ACCESS_ONCE(sem->owner); @@ -297,9 +297,9 @@ static inline bool rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) rcu_read_unlock(); /* - * If sem->owner is not set, the rwsem owner may have - * just acquired it and not set the owner yet or the rwsem - * has been released. + * If sem->owner is not set, yet we have just recently entered the + * slowpath, then there is a possibility reader(s) may have the lock. + * To be safe, avoid spinning in these situations. */ return on_cpu; } diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c index 42f806d..e2d3bc7 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.c @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ #include <linux/atomic.h> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM) +#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER static inline void rwsem_set_owner(struct rw_semaphore *sem) { sem->owner = current; |