mm owner: fix race between swapoff and exit

There's a race between mm->owner assignment and swapoff, more easily
seen when task slab poisoning is turned on.  The condition occurs when
try_to_unuse() runs in parallel with an exiting task.  A similar race
can occur with callers of get_task_mm(), such as /proc/<pid>/<mmstats>
or ptrace or page migration.

CPU0                                    CPU1
                                        try_to_unuse
                                        looks at mm = task0->mm
                                        increments mm->mm_users
task 0 exits
mm->owner needs to be updated, but no
new owner is found (mm_users > 1, but
no other task has task->mm = task0->mm)
mm_update_next_owner() leaves
                                        mmput(mm) decrements mm->mm_users
task0 freed
                                        dereferencing mm->owner fails

The fix is to notify the subsystem via mm_owner_changed callback(),
if no new owner is found, by specifying the new task as NULL.

Jiri Slaby:
mm->owner was set to NULL prior to calling cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(), but
must be set after that, so as not to pass NULL as old owner causing oops.

Daisuke Nishimura:
mm_update_next_owner() may set mm->owner to NULL, but mem_cgroup_from_task()
and its callers need to take account of this situation to avoid oops.

Hugh Dickins:
Lockdep warning and hang below exec_mmap() when testing these patches.
exit_mm() up_reads mmap_sem before calling mm_update_next_owner(),
so exec_mmap() now needs to do the same.  And with that repositioning,
there's now no point in mm_need_new_owner() allowing for NULL mm.

Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

2 files changed, 13 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 13932abd..a0123d7 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2738,14 +2738,15 @@ void cgroup_fork_callbacks(struct task_struct *child)
  */
 void cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new)
 {
-	struct cgroup *oldcgrp, *newcgrp;
+	struct cgroup *oldcgrp, *newcgrp = NULL;
 
 	if (need_mm_owner_callback) {
 		int i;
 		for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) {
 			struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
 			oldcgrp = task_cgroup(old, ss->subsys_id);
-			newcgrp = task_cgroup(new, ss->subsys_id);
+			if (new)
+				newcgrp = task_cgroup(new, ss->subsys_id);
 			if (oldcgrp == newcgrp)
 				continue;
 			if (ss->mm_owner_changed)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 1639564..85a83c8 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -583,8 +583,6 @@ mm_need_new_owner(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p)
 	 * If there are other users of the mm and the owner (us) is exiting
 	 * we need to find a new owner to take on the responsibility.
 	 */
-	if (!mm)
-		return 0;
 	if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 1)
 		return 0;
 	if (mm->owner != p)
@@ -627,6 +625,16 @@ retry:
 	} while_each_thread(g, c);
 
 	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	/*
+	 * We found no owner yet mm_users > 1: this implies that we are
+	 * most likely racing with swapoff (try_to_unuse()) or /proc or
+	 * ptrace or page migration (get_task_mm()).  Mark owner as NULL,
+	 * so that subsystems can understand the callback and take action.
+	 */
+	down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
+	cgroup_mm_owner_callbacks(mm->owner, NULL);
+	mm->owner = NULL;
+	up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	return;
 
 assign_new_owner: