clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h b/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
index 5be7627..9a18f12 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@ extern void tk_debug_account_sleep_time(struct timespec64 *t);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CLOCKSOURCE_VALIDATE_LAST_CYCLE
-static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
+static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
 {
-	cycle_t ret = (now - last) & mask;
+	u64 ret = (now - last) & mask;
 
 	/*
 	 * Prevent time going backwards by checking the MSB of mask in
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
 	return ret & ~(mask >> 1) ? 0 : ret;
 }
 #else
-static inline cycle_t clocksource_delta(cycle_t now, cycle_t last, cycle_t mask)
+static inline u64 clocksource_delta(u64 now, u64 last, u64 mask)
 {
 	return (now - last) & mask;
 }