summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/sched_fair.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Turner <pjt@google.com>2010-11-15 15:47:05 -0800
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2010-11-18 13:27:48 +0100
commit67e86250f8ea7b8f7da53ac25ea73c6bd71f5cd9 (patch)
tree9e429bdc568172f00e81aa4dcb57796ed0d404dd /kernel/sched_fair.c
parente33078baa4d30ad1d0e46d1f62b9e5a63a3e6ee3 (diff)
downloadop-kernel-dev-67e86250f8ea7b8f7da53ac25ea73c6bd71f5cd9.zip
op-kernel-dev-67e86250f8ea7b8f7da53ac25ea73c6bd71f5cd9.tar.gz
sched: Introduce hierarchal order on shares update list
Avoid duplicate shares update calls by ensuring children always appear before parents in rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. This allows us to do a single in-order traversal for update_shares(). Since we always enqueue in bottom-up order this reduces to 2 cases: 1) Our parent is already in the list, e.g. root \ b /\ c d* (root->b->c already enqueued) Since d's parent is enqueued we push it to the head of the list, implicitly ahead of b. 2) Our parent does not appear in the list (or we have no parent) In this case we enqueue to the tail of the list, if our parent is subsequently enqueued (bottom-up) it will appear to our right by the same rule. Signed-off-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <20101115234938.022488865@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched_fair.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched_fair.c26
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index a543a5b..b320753 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -146,8 +146,20 @@ static inline struct cfs_rq *cpu_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int this_cpu)
static inline void list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (!cfs_rq->on_list) {
- list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ /*
+ * Ensure we either appear before our parent (if already
+ * enqueued) or force our parent to appear after us when it is
+ * enqueued. The fact that we always enqueue bottom-up
+ * reduces this to two cases.
+ */
+ if (cfs_rq->tg->parent &&
+ cfs_rq->tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))]->on_list) {
+ list_add_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
+ &rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ } else {
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&cfs_rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list,
&rq_of(cfs_rq)->leaf_cfs_rq_list);
+ }
cfs_rq->on_list = 1;
}
@@ -2016,7 +2028,7 @@ out:
/*
* update tg->load_weight by folding this cpu's load_avg
*/
-static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
+static int update_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -2056,14 +2068,8 @@ static void update_shares(int cpu)
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq) {
- struct task_group *tg = cfs_rq->tg;
-
- do {
- tg_shares_up(tg, cpu);
- tg = tg->parent;
- } while (tg);
- }
+ for_each_leaf_cfs_rq(rq, cfs_rq)
+ update_shares_cpu(cfs_rq->tg, cpu);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
OpenPOWER on IntegriCloud