diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-09-16 12:29:43 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-09-16 12:29:43 -0700 |
commit | 37407ea7f93864c2cfc03edf8f37872ec539ea2b (patch) | |
tree | 7c07e7adadd40fc94cebfe816f1c65a4a630b147 /kernel/sched | |
parent | 3f0c3c8fe30c725c1264fb6db8cc4b69db3a658a (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-37407ea7f93864c2cfc03edf8f37872ec539ea2b.zip op-kernel-dev-37407ea7f93864c2cfc03edf8f37872ec539ea2b.tar.gz |
Revert "sched: Improve scalability via 'CPU buddies', which withstand random perturbations"
This reverts commit 970e178985cadbca660feb02f4d2ee3a09f7fdda.
Nikolay Ulyanitsky reported thatthe 3.6-rc5 kernel has a 15-20%
performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 on his machine (running "pgbench").
Borislav Petkov was able to reproduce this, and bisected it to this
commit 970e178985ca ("sched: Improve scalability via 'CPU buddies' ...")
apparently because the new single-idle-buddy model simply doesn't find
idle CPU's to reschedule on aggressively enough.
Mike Galbraith suspects that it is likely due to the user-mode spinlocks
in PostgreSQL not reacting well to preemption, but we don't really know
the details - I'll just revert the commit for now.
There are hopefully other approaches to improve scheduler scalability
without it causing these kinds of downsides.
Reported-by: Nikolay Ulyanitsky <lystor@gmail.com>
Bisected-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 39 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 28 |
2 files changed, 22 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index a4ea245..649c9f8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6014,11 +6014,6 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCE set (Last Level Cache Domain) for this * allows us to avoid some pointer chasing select_idle_sibling(). * - * Iterate domains and sched_groups downward, assigning CPUs to be - * select_idle_sibling() hw buddy. Cross-wiring hw makes bouncing - * due to random perturbation self canceling, ie sw buddies pull - * their counterpart to their CPU's hw counterpart. - * * Also keep a unique ID per domain (we use the first cpu number in * the cpumask of the domain), this allows us to quickly tell if * two cpus are in the same cache domain, see cpus_share_cache(). @@ -6032,40 +6027,8 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu) int id = cpu; sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES); - if (sd) { - struct sched_domain *tmp = sd; - struct sched_group *sg, *prev; - bool right; - - /* - * Traverse to first CPU in group, and count hops - * to cpu from there, switching direction on each - * hop, never ever pointing the last CPU rightward. - */ - do { - id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(tmp)); - prev = sg = tmp->groups; - right = 1; - - while (cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg)) != id) - sg = sg->next; - - while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg))) { - prev = sg; - sg = sg->next; - right = !right; - } - - /* A CPU went down, never point back to domain start. */ - if (right && cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg->next)) == id) - right = false; - - sg = right ? sg->next : prev; - tmp->idle_buddy = cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg)); - } while ((tmp = tmp->child)); - + if (sd) id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd)); - } rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu), sd); per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = id; diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 42d9df6..96e2b18 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -2637,6 +2637,8 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) int cpu = smp_processor_id(); int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p); struct sched_domain *sd; + struct sched_group *sg; + int i; /* * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu and if it is @@ -2653,17 +2655,29 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target) return prev_cpu; /* - * Otherwise, check assigned siblings to find an elegible idle cpu. + * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu. */ sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target)); - for_each_lower_domain(sd) { - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(sd->idle_buddy, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) - continue; - if (idle_cpu(sd->idle_buddy)) - return sd->idle_buddy; - } + sg = sd->groups; + do { + if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg), + tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) + goto next; + for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) { + if (!idle_cpu(i)) + goto next; + } + + target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg), + tsk_cpus_allowed(p)); + goto done; +next: + sg = sg->next; + } while (sg != sd->groups); + } +done: return target; } |