sched/wake_q: Rename WAKE_Q to DEFINE_WAKE_Q

Currently the wake_q data structure is defined by the WAKE_Q() macro.
This macro, however, looks like a function doing something as "wake" is
a verb. Even checkpatch.pl was confused as it reported warnings like

  WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
  #548: FILE: kernel/futex.c:3665:
  +	int ret;
  +	WAKE_Q(wake_q);

This patch renames the WAKE_Q() macro to DEFINE_WAKE_Q() which clarifies
what the macro is doing and eliminates the checkpatch.pl warnings.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479401198-1765-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com
[ Resolved conflict and added missing rename. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

3 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index a65e09a..c073168 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static noinline void __sched __mutex_unlock_slowpath(struct mutex *lock, unsigne
 {
 	struct task_struct *next = NULL;
 	unsigned long owner, flags;
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, ip);
 
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index 1ec0f48..d8d7a15 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ rt_mutex_fastunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 		    bool (*slowfn)(struct rt_mutex *lock,
 				   struct wake_q_head *wqh))
 {
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(lock, current, NULL))) {
 		rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 2fa2e2e6..263e744 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore __sched *rwsem_down_read_failed(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 	long count, adjustment = -RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	waiter.task = tsk;
 	waiter.type = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 	bool waiting = true; /* any queued threads before us */
 	struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
 	struct rw_semaphore *ret = sem;
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	/* undo write bias from down_write operation, stop active locking */
 	count = atomic_long_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS, &sem->count);
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ __rwsem_down_write_failed_common(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
 		 * wake any read locks that were queued ahead of us.
 		 */
 		if (count > RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS) {
-			WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+			DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 			__rwsem_mark_wake(sem, RWSEM_WAKE_READERS, &wake_q);
 			/*
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ __visible
 struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	/*
 	 * If a spinner is present, it is not necessary to do the wakeup.
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ __visible
 struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_downgrade_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
-	WAKE_Q(wake_q);
+	DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);