diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> | 2011-09-02 01:30:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2011-09-18 13:58:57 +0200 |
commit | 0119fee449f501d55924914a90f152540dd4ef9a (patch) | |
tree | 2ed9f5cd1fbdbaf6b237426ec4452d0e7ecf3a08 /kernel/lockdep.c | |
parent | cb475de3d12df6912bc95048202ae8c280d4cad5 (diff) | |
download | op-kernel-dev-0119fee449f501d55924914a90f152540dd4ef9a.zip op-kernel-dev-0119fee449f501d55924914a90f152540dd4ef9a.tar.gz |
lockdep: Comment all warnings
Andrew requested I comment all the lockdep WARN()s to help other people
figure out wth is wrong..
Requested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1315301493.3191.9.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/lockdep.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/lockdep.c | 156 |
1 files changed, 147 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c index 91d67ce..c081fa9 100644 --- a/kernel/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -96,8 +96,13 @@ static int graph_lock(void) static inline int graph_unlock(void) { - if (debug_locks && !arch_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock)) + if (debug_locks && !arch_spin_is_locked(&lockdep_lock)) { + /* + * The lockdep graph lock isn't locked while we expect it to + * be, we're confused now, bye! + */ return DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1); + } current->lockdep_recursion--; arch_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock); @@ -134,6 +139,9 @@ static struct lock_class lock_classes[MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS]; static inline struct lock_class *hlock_class(struct held_lock *hlock) { if (!hlock->class_idx) { + /* + * Someone passed in garbage, we give up. + */ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1); return NULL; } @@ -687,6 +695,10 @@ look_up_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass) */ list_for_each_entry(class, hash_head, hash_entry) { if (class->key == key) { + /* + * Huh! same key, different name? Did someone trample + * on some memory? We're most confused. + */ WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name); return class; } @@ -800,6 +812,10 @@ out_unlock_set: else if (subclass < NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES) lock->class_cache[subclass] = class; + /* + * Hash collision, did we smoke some? We found a class with a matching + * hash but the subclass -- which is hashed in -- didn't match. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(class->subclass != subclass)) return NULL; @@ -926,7 +942,7 @@ static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock, unsigned long nr; nr = lock - list_entries; - WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); + WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */ lock->parent = parent; lock->class->dep_gen_id = lockdep_dependency_gen_id; } @@ -936,7 +952,7 @@ static inline unsigned long lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock) unsigned long nr; nr = lock - list_entries; - WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); + WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */ return lock->class->dep_gen_id == lockdep_dependency_gen_id; } @@ -1196,6 +1212,9 @@ static noinline int print_bfs_bug(int ret) if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()) return 0; + /* + * Breadth-first-search failed, graph got corrupted? + */ WARN(1, "lockdep bfs error:%d\n", ret); return 0; @@ -1944,6 +1963,11 @@ out_bug: if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()) return 0; + /* + * Clearly we all shouldn't be here, but since we made it we + * can reliable say we messed up our state. See the above two + * gotos for reasons why we could possibly end up here. + */ WARN_ON(1); return 0; @@ -1975,6 +1999,11 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock_curr, *hlock_next; int i, j; + /* + * We might need to take the graph lock, ensure we've got IRQs + * disabled to make this an IRQ-safe lock.. for recursion reasons + * lockdep won't complain about its own locking errors. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; /* @@ -2126,6 +2155,10 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr) hlock = curr->held_locks + i; if (chain_key != hlock->prev_chain_key) { debug_locks_off(); + /* + * We got mighty confused, our chain keys don't match + * with what we expect, someone trample on our task state? + */ WARN(1, "hm#1, depth: %u [%u], %016Lx != %016Lx\n", curr->lockdep_depth, i, (unsigned long long)chain_key, @@ -2133,6 +2166,9 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr) return; } id = hlock->class_idx - 1; + /* + * Whoops ran out of static storage again? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS)) return; @@ -2144,6 +2180,10 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr) } if (chain_key != curr->curr_chain_key) { debug_locks_off(); + /* + * More smoking hash instead of calculating it, damn see these + * numbers float.. I bet that a pink elephant stepped on my memory. + */ WARN(1, "hm#2, depth: %u [%u], %016Lx != %016Lx\n", curr->lockdep_depth, i, (unsigned long long)chain_key, @@ -2525,12 +2565,24 @@ void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long ip) return; } + /* + * We're enabling irqs and according to our state above irqs weren't + * already enabled, yet we find the hardware thinks they are in fact + * enabled.. someone messed up their IRQ state tracing. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return; + /* + * See the fine text that goes along with this variable definition. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(unlikely(early_boot_irqs_disabled))) return; + /* + * Can't allow enabling interrupts while in an interrupt handler, + * that's general bad form and such. Recursion, limited stack etc.. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_context)) return; @@ -2558,6 +2610,10 @@ void trace_hardirqs_off_caller(unsigned long ip) if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion)) return; + /* + * So we're supposed to get called after you mask local IRQs, but for + * some reason the hardware doesn't quite think you did a proper job. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return; @@ -2590,6 +2646,10 @@ void trace_softirqs_on(unsigned long ip) if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion)) return; + /* + * We fancy IRQs being disabled here, see softirq.c, avoids + * funny state and nesting things. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return; @@ -2626,6 +2686,9 @@ void trace_softirqs_off(unsigned long ip) if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion)) return; + /* + * We fancy IRQs being disabled here, see softirq.c + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return; @@ -2637,6 +2700,9 @@ void trace_softirqs_off(unsigned long ip) curr->softirq_disable_ip = ip; curr->softirq_disable_event = ++curr->irq_events; debug_atomic_inc(softirqs_off_events); + /* + * Whoops, we wanted softirqs off, so why aren't they? + */ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!softirq_count()); } else debug_atomic_inc(redundant_softirqs_off); @@ -2661,6 +2727,9 @@ static void __lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags) if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) return; + /* + * Oi! Can't be having __GFP_FS allocations with IRQs disabled. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags))) return; @@ -2773,13 +2842,13 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, return 0; } -#else +#else /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */ static inline int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) { - WARN_ON(1); + WARN_ON(1); /* Impossible innit? when we don't have TRACE_IRQFLAG */ return 1; } @@ -2799,7 +2868,7 @@ void lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask) { } -#endif +#endif /* defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) */ /* * Mark a lock with a usage bit, and validate the state transition: @@ -2880,6 +2949,9 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name, lock->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id(); #endif + /* + * Can't be having no nameless bastards around this place! + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!name)) { lock->name = "NULL"; return; @@ -2887,6 +2959,9 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name, lock->name = name; + /* + * No key, no joy, we need to hash something. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!key)) return; /* @@ -2894,6 +2969,9 @@ void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name, */ if (!static_obj(key)) { printk("BUG: key %p not in .data!\n", key); + /* + * What it says above ^^^^^, I suggest you read it. + */ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(1); return; } @@ -2932,6 +3010,11 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) return 0; + /* + * Lockdep should run with IRQs disabled, otherwise we could + * get an interrupt which would want to take locks, which would + * end up in lockdep and have you got a head-ache already? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; @@ -2963,6 +3046,9 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, * dependency checks are done) */ depth = curr->lockdep_depth; + /* + * Ran out of static storage for our per-task lock stack again have we? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth >= MAX_LOCK_DEPTH)) return 0; @@ -2981,6 +3067,10 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, } hlock = curr->held_locks + depth; + /* + * Plain impossible, we just registered it and checked it weren't no + * NULL like.. I bet this mushroom I ate was good! + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!class)) return 0; hlock->class_idx = class_idx; @@ -3015,11 +3105,17 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, * the hash, not class->key. */ id = class - lock_classes; + /* + * Whoops, we did it again.. ran straight out of our static allocation. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS)) return 0; chain_key = curr->curr_chain_key; if (!depth) { + /* + * How can we have a chain hash when we ain't got no keys?! + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(chain_key != 0)) return 0; chain_head = 1; @@ -3091,6 +3187,9 @@ static int check_unlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock, { if (unlikely(!debug_locks)) return 0; + /* + * Lockdep should run with IRQs disabled, recursion, head-ache, etc.. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; @@ -3120,6 +3219,11 @@ static int match_held_lock(struct held_lock *hlock, struct lockdep_map *lock) if (!class) return 0; + /* + * References, but not a lock we're actually ref-counting? + * State got messed up, follow the sites that change ->references + * and try to make sense of it. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!hlock->nest_lock)) return 0; @@ -3142,6 +3246,10 @@ __lock_set_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name, int i; depth = curr->lockdep_depth; + /* + * This function is about (re)setting the class of a held lock, + * yet we're not actually holding any locks. Naughty user! + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth)) return 0; @@ -3177,6 +3285,10 @@ found_it: return 0; } + /* + * I took it apart and put it back together again, except now I have + * these 'spare' parts.. where shall I put them. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth)) return 0; return 1; @@ -3201,6 +3313,10 @@ lock_release_non_nested(struct task_struct *curr, * of held locks: */ depth = curr->lockdep_depth; + /* + * So we're all set to release this lock.. wait what lock? We don't + * own any locks, you've been drinking again? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth)) return 0; @@ -3253,6 +3369,10 @@ found_it: return 0; } + /* + * We had N bottles of beer on the wall, we drank one, but now + * there's not N-1 bottles of beer left on the wall... + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1)) return 0; return 1; @@ -3283,6 +3403,9 @@ static int lock_release_nested(struct task_struct *curr, return lock_release_non_nested(curr, lock, ip); curr->lockdep_depth--; + /* + * No more locks, but somehow we've got hash left over, who left it? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth && (hlock->prev_chain_key != 0))) return 0; @@ -3365,10 +3488,13 @@ static void check_flags(unsigned long flags) * check if not in hardirq contexts: */ if (!hardirq_count()) { - if (softirq_count()) + if (softirq_count()) { + /* like the above, but with softirqs */ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->softirqs_enabled); - else + } else { + /* lick the above, does it taste good? */ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!current->softirqs_enabled); + } } if (!debug_locks) @@ -3506,6 +3632,10 @@ __lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip) int i, contention_point, contending_point; depth = curr->lockdep_depth; + /* + * Whee, we contended on this lock, except it seems we're not + * actually trying to acquire anything much at all.. + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth)) return; @@ -3555,6 +3685,10 @@ __lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned long ip) int i, cpu; depth = curr->lockdep_depth; + /* + * Yay, we acquired ownership of this lock we didn't try to + * acquire, how the heck did that happen? + */ if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!depth)) return; @@ -3759,8 +3893,12 @@ void lockdep_reset_lock(struct lockdep_map *lock) match |= class == lock->class_cache[j]; if (unlikely(match)) { - if (debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()) + if (debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()) { + /* + * We all just reset everything, how did it match? + */ WARN_ON(1); + } goto out_restore; } } |