[PATCH] irqpoll

Anyone reporting a stuck IRQ should try these options.  Its effectiveness
varies we've found in the Fedora case.  Quite a few systems with misdescribed
IRQ routing just work when you use irqpoll.  It also fixes up the VIA systems
although thats now fixed with the VIA quirk (which we could just make default
as its what Redmond OS does but Linus didn't like it historically).

A small number of systems have jammed IRQ sources or misdescribes that cause
an IRQ that we have no handler registered anywhere for.  In those cases it
doesn't help.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <number6@the-village.bc.nu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 111 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index ba039e8..7df9abd 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -11,6 +11,83 @@
 #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 
+static int irqfixup;
+
+/*
+ * Recovery handler for misrouted interrupts.
+ */
+
+static int misrouted_irq(int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	int i;
+	irq_desc_t *desc;
+	int ok = 0;
+	int work = 0;	/* Did we do work for a real IRQ */
+
+	for(i = 1; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
+		struct irqaction *action;
+
+		if (i == irq)	/* Already tried */
+			continue;
+		desc = &irq_desc[i];
+		spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+		action = desc->action;
+		/* Already running on another processor */
+		if (desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS) {
+			/*
+			 * Already running: If it is shared get the other
+			 * CPU to go looking for our mystery interrupt too
+			 */
+			if (desc->action && (desc->action->flags & SA_SHIRQ))
+				desc->status |= IRQ_PENDING;
+			spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+		/* Honour the normal IRQ locking */
+		desc->status |= IRQ_INPROGRESS;
+		spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+		while (action) {
+			/* Only shared IRQ handlers are safe to call */
+			if (action->flags & SA_SHIRQ) {
+				if (action->handler(i, action->dev_id, regs) ==
+						IRQ_HANDLED)
+					ok = 1;
+			}
+			action = action->next;
+		}
+		local_irq_disable();
+		/* Now clean up the flags */
+		spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+		action = desc->action;
+
+		/*
+		 * While we were looking for a fixup someone queued a real
+		 * IRQ clashing with our walk
+		 */
+
+		while ((desc->status & IRQ_PENDING) && action) {
+			/*
+			 * Perform real IRQ processing for the IRQ we deferred
+			 */
+			work = 1;
+			spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+			handle_IRQ_event(i, regs, action);
+			spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+			desc->status &= ~IRQ_PENDING;
+		}
+		desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
+		/*
+		 * If we did actual work for the real IRQ line we must let the
+		 * IRQ controller clean up too
+		 */
+		if(work)
+			desc->handler->end(i);
+		spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+	}
+	/* So the caller can adjust the irq error counts */
+	return ok;
+}
+
 /*
  * If 99,900 of the previous 100,000 interrupts have not been handled
  * then assume that the IRQ is stuck in some manner. Drop a diagnostic
@@ -31,7 +108,8 @@ __report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 		printk(KERN_ERR "irq event %d: bogus return value %x\n",
 				irq, action_ret);
 	} else {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "irq %d: nobody cared!\n", irq);
+		printk(KERN_ERR "irq %d: nobody cared (try booting with "
+				"the \"irqpoll\" option)\n", irq);
 	}
 	dump_stack();
 	printk(KERN_ERR "handlers:\n");
@@ -55,7 +133,8 @@ static void report_bad_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc, irqreturn_t actio
 	}
 }
 
-void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
+void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret,
+			struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	if (action_ret != IRQ_HANDLED) {
 		desc->irqs_unhandled++;
@@ -63,6 +142,15 @@ void note_interrupt(unsigned int irq, irq_desc_t *desc, irqreturn_t action_ret)
 			report_bad_irq(irq, desc, action_ret);
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(irqfixup)) {
+		/* Don't punish working computers */
+		if ((irqfixup == 2 && irq == 0) || action_ret == IRQ_NONE) {
+			int ok = misrouted_irq(irq, regs);
+			if (action_ret == IRQ_NONE)
+				desc->irqs_unhandled -= ok;
+		}
+	}
+
 	desc->irq_count++;
 	if (desc->irq_count < 100000)
 		return;
@@ -94,3 +182,24 @@ int __init noirqdebug_setup(char *str)
 
 __setup("noirqdebug", noirqdebug_setup);
 
+static int __init irqfixup_setup(char *str)
+{
+	irqfixup = 1;
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup support enabled.\n");
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "This may impact system performance.\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+
+__setup("irqfixup", irqfixup_setup);
+
+static int __init irqpoll_setup(char *str)
+{
+	irqfixup = 2;
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "Misrouted IRQ fixup and polling support "
+				"enabled\n");
+	printk(KERN_WARNING "This may significantly impact system "
+				"performance\n");
+	return 1;
+}
+
+__setup("irqpoll", irqpoll_setup);