smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid

If you do

	smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...)

then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds.

As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do.

While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency
reasons.

And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put
uniprocessor-specific code and storage.  It should mirror kernel/smp.c.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 2921d90..2aebc4c 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -40,7 +40,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER) += rtmutex-tester.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS) += smp.o
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
+obj-y += smp.o
+else
+obj-y += up.o
+endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o